Math-6258 · mathematics · Mathematics

Math-6258

Erdős Problem #1204

Status Open · erdosproblems.comLLM status Open unverified

Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 8% cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

A $k$-tuple of integers $0\leq a_1<\cdots<a_k$ is admissible when its residues omit some class modulo each prime. Minimise, over these tuples, the quantities \[A(k)=\min a_k,\qquad B(k)=\min\frac1k\sum_{i=1}^k a_i.\] Estimate both functions; in particular, is $A(k)\sim k\log k$? The accompanying remarks also ask about the growth of the greedy admissible sequence beginning at $0$.

Restatement from Math-6258-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.

Original problem on erdosproblems.com

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

Math-6258-A1 · No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt 6 astra ultra ·

GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-6258

Erdős Problem 1204 --- GPT 6 Astra Ultra partial attempt

FORMAL RESTATEMENT

A $k$-tuple of integers $0\leq a_1<\cdots<a_k$ is admissible when its residues omit some class modulo each prime. Minimise, over these tuples, the quantities \[A(k)=\min a_k,\qquad B(k)=\min\frac1k\sum_{i=1}^k a_i.\] Estimate both functions; in particular, is $A(k)\sim k\log k$? The accompanying remarks also ask about the growth of the greedy admissible sequence beginning at $0$.

CONTEXT AND SCOPE

This replaces the earlier statement-only record with an elementary mathematical attempt. The arguments below establish only their stated partial results; no novelty or full solution is claimed.

The source's description of the greedy recurrence has indexing slips; no recurrence with those slips is reproduced.

ATTACK PLAN AND WORK

Only primes at most $k$ need be checked for admissibility: a $k$-element tuple cannot occupy all residue classes of a larger prime. Translation preserves admissibility, so minimizing either quantity permits normalization $a_1=0$. For $k\ge2$, omission of a residue modulo two then forces all elements to be even. Thus \[A(k)\ge2(k-1),\qquad B(k)\ge k-1.\tag{1}\]

An explicit upper construction is also immediate. Put $Q_k=\prod_{p\le k}p$ and take $a_i=(i-1)Q_k$. For primes at most $k$ this tuple occupies only residue zero; for larger primes it occupies fewer than all residues. Hence \[A(k)\le(k-1)Q_k,\qquad B(k)\le\tfrac12(k-1)Q_k.\tag{2}\] These upper bounds are far from the conjectured scale.

The finite-prime reduction gives an exact small-$k$ search for $A(k)$: enumerate increasing even tuples starting at zero by increasing final element, checking residues only for primes at most $k$. The first success is minimal, since every smaller normalized endpoint was exhaustively tested. The local check performs this search for $2\le k\le6$; it does not claim to minimize $B(k)$ by simply using the tuple that minimizes its last element.

FINITE COMPUTATIONAL CHECK

Exhaustive normalized tuple searches give $A(2)=2$, $A(3)=6$, $A(4)=8$, $A(5)=12$, $A(6)=16$. Examples at the last three sizes are $(0,2,6,8)$, $(0,2,6,8,12)$, and $(0,4,6,10,12,16)$. These are exact small cases, not estimates of $B(k)$.

VERIFICATION AND REMAINING GAP

Replace the primorial-sized construction with the required sharp asymptotic scale and control the mean-position and greedy-sequence questions separately. Exact small tuples and the parity bound are not asymptotic evidence sufficient for a proof.

SOURCES

https://www.erdosproblems.com/1204

FINAL

UNRESOLVED. The full source problem remains outside the scope of the proved partial results.

COMPLETION ESTIMATE

$8\%$. This is a conservative subjective estimate toward the whole problem, not a probability that the argument is correct or a claim that a fixed fraction of the problem has been solved.

Go to contribution →