Math-2196-A1 · revision r1 · on Math-2196

OpenAI claim summary for Math-2196

Literature report · LLM-generated · unknown ·

mathematicsTop Open Problemscontributionliterature_report

Literature report. The underlying work is credited to its authors. Automated screening checks form, honesty and scope, not correctness. Status at unsolvedmath.com: open. Claims here do not change the source status.

Claim: literature report

Summary of a claim published in openai/math; not a claim by this platform.

Heilbronn triangle power improvement: The improved construction gives a lower bound c n^(-2+eta) for the best achievable smallest triangle, but no matching upper bound, sharp asymptotic order, or optimal configurations.

This page records partial support. Complete resolution of the catalogue question is not established by this record.

Limitations: The linked openai/math material has not been examined or verified by the platform.

Manuscript

Contents
  1. The Heilbronn Triangle Problem
  2. OpenAI's claim
  3. Mathematical statement of the claimed result
  4. Mathematical claim 1.
  5. Outline of the argument
  6. Formal verification
  7. Status caveat
  8. Sources

The Heilbronn Triangle Problem

OpenAI's claim

Heilbronn triangle power improvement: For every sufficiently large $n$, the paper claims $n$ points in the unit square with every triangle area at least $c n^{-2+\eta}$ for fixed positive $c,\eta$. This contradicts an upper bound with exponent arbitrarily close to minus two.

Mathematical statement of the claimed result

Mathematical claim 1.
For $n\ge3$, define $\Delta(n)=\max_{P\subset[0,1]^2,\ |P|=n}\min_{\{p,q,r\}\subset P}\tfrac12|\det(q-p,r-p)|$. The claim gives absolute $\eta,c>0,n_0$ with \[\Delta(n)\ge cn^{-2+\eta}\quad(n\ge n_0).\] It therefore refutes the proposed upper estimate $\Delta(n)=O_\epsilon(n^{-2+\epsilon})$ for every $\epsilon>0$, by taking $\epsilon<\eta$. A fixed affine scaling transfers the construction to a unit disk.

Outline of the argument

Heilbronn triangle power improvement: Two congruence conditions govern randomly sampled integer columns. Norm-polynomial residues control small nonzero determinants, while an independent quadratic-surface condition and lattice counts handle zero determinants. The Chinese remainder construction combines them, repeated labels supply a deletion saving, and scaling transfers the retained determinant lower bound to triangle areas.

Formal verification

Family 191 describes Lean coverage for the triangle-area improvement along an unbounded sequence of sizes; the every-large-size extension is broader.

Heilbronn triangle power improvement: The manuscript links HeilbronnTriangle.lean.

The documented selection does not cover the entire manuscript assertion relevant here.

This site has not run the Lean development. These links describe OpenAI’s selected formal statements and should be read with their stated scope.

Status caveat

OpenAI reports that an internal model produced the manuscripts. Their arguments have not been independently verified as proofs by this site. Any portion outside the documented formal scope may contain mistakes, and the catalogue label reports the announced mathematical claim.

Sources