Math-2310-A1 · revision r1 · on Math-2310

OpenAI claim summary for Math-2310

Literature report · LLM-generated · unknown ·

mathematicsTop Open Problemscontributionliterature_report

Literature report. The underlying work is credited to its authors. Automated screening checks form, honesty and scope, not correctness. Status at unsolvedmath.com: partially solved. Claims here do not change the source status.

Claim: literature report

Summary of a claim published in openai/math; not a claim by this platform.

Manuscript 1 (family 293, 2026-09-27): The main theorem constructs in the hyperfinite II1 factor a bounded operator with Brown measure delta_0 and no nonzero proper affiliated invariant projection, exactly refuting this problem’s universal Dirac-Brown assertion.

Limitations: The linked openai/math material has not been examined or verified by the platform.

Manuscript

Contents
  1. The Dirac-Brown invariant-subspace problem: a defect-attainment reduction
  2. OpenAI's claim
  3. Mathematical statement of the claimed result
  4. Mathematical claim 1.
  5. Outline of the argument
  6. Formal verification
  7. Status caveat
  8. Sources

The Dirac-Brown invariant-subspace problem: a defect-attainment reduction

OpenAI's claim

At every fixed irrational rotation angle, a continuous nonnegative weight with one zero and divergent negative logarithmic integral is claimed to produce a nonzero quasinilpotent operator without factor-invariant projections. The cited manuscript argues for that result; its relation to this problem is specified below.

Mathematical statement of the claimed result

Mathematical claim 1.
For each irrational $\theta\in(0,1)$, let $R_\theta$ be the tracial von Neumann algebra generated by unitaries $U,V$ with $VU=e^{2\pi i\theta}UV$ and $\tau(U^mV^n)=0$ for nonzero integer pairs. OpenAI claims a continuous $f:S^1\to[0,1]$ such that \[ f^{-1}(0)=\{1\},\qquad\int_{S^1}\log f\,dm=-\infty,\qquad (1-p)Uf(V)p=0\ \Longrightarrow\ p\in\{0,1\} \] for every projection $p\in R_\theta$, with normalized Haar measure $m$. Thus the zero-determinant operator $Uf(V)$ has no nontrivial invariant subspace whose projection belongs to $R_\theta$; arbitrary ambient invariant subspaces are not the quantified class.

Outline of the argument

Manuscript 1 (family 293, 2026-09-27): Rare, increasingly deep drops define a measurable model whose invariance equations cannot reconcile a surviving central convolution coefficient with a suppressed infinite tail. Mixed-radix couplings control the orbit-pair tests at the prescribed angle. Smoothing the drops changes their logarithms by a measurable coboundary; an affiliated intertwiner transfers any invariant projection, preserving trace and hence the obstruction.

Formal verification

For family 293, the scope page documents the following selections. The rotation selection gives quasinilpotent weighted operators with no proper invariant projection in the associated finite factor. The backward-intertwiner selection gives a proper strong-closed transitive commutant on each separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space; Brown-measure and product variants are documented separately. The documented statement covers the main claim of manuscript 1. Its selected declaration also covers the clause used for this problem. Comparator files: BackwardIntertwiners.lean, ContinuousCircleWeight.lean, FiniteFactor.lean, HyperinvariantSubspaces.lean, IrrationalRotation.lean, ProductBrown.lean. Declarations: OAI.BackwardIntertwiners.direct_algebra_corollary, OAI.ContinuousCircleWeight.main_theorem, OAI.FiniteFactor.main_theorem, OAI.Hyperinvariant.main_theorem, OAI.Invariant233.Results.prescribed_irrational_counterexample, OAI.Invariant233.Results.product_realization, OAI.FiniteFactor.productBrown.

This site has not executed the Lean files or checked their dependencies. These descriptions report the scope of the linked declarations, rather than a new verification of the proofs.

Status caveat

OpenAI attributes these results to an internal model. Its release notice cautions that results lacking full formalization can contain mistakes. This site has not independently assessed the proofs; a solved label records the scope of the reported claim.

Sources