gpt pro 5.2 attempt on Math-661, version 2
mathematicsErdős problemscontributionManuscript
Contents
Problem 66 --- Round 2 (continuation & gap-closure mode)
1) ROUND-2 OBJECTIVE
Path (C): obstruction/correction direction. Starting from the Round 1 status UNRESOLVED, I pursue the "disproof/rigidity" track by extracting a strictly stronger necessary consequence of the existence of a nonzero limit \[ \frac{(1_A\ast 1_A)(n)}{\log n}\to L\in(0,\infty). \] Round 1 only obtained the order of growth $A(x)=\Theta(\sqrt{x\log x})$. In this round I close that gap: assuming the limit exists, I prove that the counting function in fact has a full asymptotic with an explicit constant depending on $L$: \[ A(x)\sim 2\sqrt{\frac{L}{\pi}}\,\sqrt{x\log x}. \] This is a rigid constraint on any potential example and is a substantial strengthening of Round 1.2) ROUND-1 FOUNDATION USED
I rely on the following Round 1 items (as black boxes):- The formal definitions: $a_n:=1_A(n)$ and $r(n):=(1_A\ast 1_A)(n)=\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}a_ka_{n-k}$ counts ordered representations.
- Corollary 66.1 only as context (I strengthen it).
3) NEW INSIGHT / TOOL (ROUND-2)
New tool: Abelian--Tauberian passage through generating functions/Laplace transforms.Let \[ F(t):=\sum_{n\ge 2} r(n)e^{-tn}=\Big(\sum_{m\ge 1} a_m e^{-tm}\Big)^2\qquad(t>0), \] which is the Laplace transform of $r(n)$ and equals the square of the Laplace transform of $a_m$.
From the assumed pointwise asymptotic $r(n)\sim L\log n$ I first derive an Abelian asymptotic for $F(t)$ as $t\to 0^+$, then take a square root, and finally apply Karamata's Tauberian theorem (Laplace transform form) to recover an explicit asymptotic for the counting function $A(x)=\sum_{m\le x}a_m$.
4) ATTACK PLAN (ROUND-2)
Round 1 gap addressed: Corollary 66.1 only yields two-sided bounds $c\sqrt{x\log x}\le A(x)\le C\sqrt{x\log x}$.Goal in this round: upgrade this to an explicit asymptotic with constant.
Plan:
- Prove an Abelian lemma: from $r(n)\sim L\log n$, show \[ F(t)=\sum_{n\ge 2} r(n)e^{-tn}\sim \frac{L}{t}\log\frac1t\qquad(t\to 0^+). \]
- Take square roots to obtain the Laplace transform asymptotic for $a_n$: \[ G(t):=\sum_{m\ge 1} a_m e^{-tm}=\sqrt{F(t)}\sim \sqrt{L}\,t^{-1/2}\,\sqrt{\log\tfrac1t}. \]
- Apply Karamata's Tauberian theorem to the nondecreasing function $A(x)$ to conclude \[ A(x)\sim \frac{\sqrt{L}}{\Gamma(3/2)}\,x^{1/2}\,\sqrt{\log x}=2\sqrt{\frac{L}{\pi}}\,\sqrt{x\log x}. \]
5) WORK (ROUND-2)
Throughout, assume \begin{equation} \label{wsref-0-65-71-3a-6c-69-6d-69-74-2d-61-73-73-75-6d-70-74-69-6f-6e} \frac{r(n)}{\log n}\to L\in(0,\infty),\qquad r(n)=(1_A\ast 1_A)(n). \end{equation}Lemma 66.3 (model Laplace asymptotic for $\sum \log n\,e^{-tn}$). Define \[ S(t):=\sum_{n\ge 2} (\log n)e^{-tn}\qquad(t>0). \] Then as $t\to 0^+$, \[ S(t)=\frac{1}{t}\log\frac{1}{t}+O\Big(\frac{1}{t}\Big). \] In particular $S(t)\sim \frac{1}{t}\log\frac{1}{t}$.
It remains to compare $S(t)$ and $I(t)$. The function $g_t(x):=(\log x)e^{-tx}$ is smooth, nonnegative, and tends to $0$ as $x\to\infty$. A standard bounded-variation estimate (e.g. summation by parts) gives \[ \Big|\sum_{n\ge 2} g_t(n)-\int_{1}^{\infty} g_t(x)\,dx\Big|\le g_t(1)+\int_{1}^{\infty}|g_t'(x)|\,dx. \] Compute $g_t'(x)=(1/x-t\log x)e^{-tx}$, so \[ \int_{1}^{\infty}|g_t'(x)|\,dx\le \int_{1}^{\infty}\Big(\frac{1}{x}+t\log x\Big)e^{-tx}\,dx. \] After the substitution $u=tx$, both integrals on the right are $O(\log\tfrac1t)$ as $t\to 0^+$, hence the discretization error is $O(\log\tfrac1t)$. Therefore \[ S(t)=I(t)+O\Big(\log\frac1t\Big)=\frac{1}{t}\log\frac1t+O\Big(\frac{1}{t}\Big), \] as claimed. ∎
Lemma 66.4 (Abelian step: Laplace asymptotic for $r(n)$). Let \[ F(t):=\sum_{n\ge 2} r(n)e^{-tn}\qquad(t>0). \] Under (eq:limit-assumption), as $t\to 0^+$, \[ F(t)\sim \frac{L}{t}\log\frac1t. \]
Lemma 66.5 (square-root transfer to the Laplace transform of $A$). Define \[ G(t):=\sum_{m\ge 1} a_m e^{-tm}=\sum_{m\in A} e^{-tm} \qquad(t>0). \] Then $F(t)=G(t)^2$ and, under (eq:limit-assumption), \[ G(t)\sim \sqrt{L}\,t^{-1/2}\,\sqrt{\log\tfrac1t}\qquad(t\to 0^+). \]
Proposition 66.6 (Tauberian sharpening of Round 1 Corollary 66.1). Assume (eq:limit-assumption). Then the counting function satisfies the full asymptotic \[ A(x):=|A\cap[1,x]|\sim 2\sqrt{\frac{L}{\pi}}\,\sqrt{x\log x}\qquad(x\to\infty). \] Equivalently, \[ \lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{A(x)^2}{x\log x}=\frac{4L}{\pi}. \]
Karamata (Laplace form, special case). Let $A(x)$ be nondecreasing, right-continuous, with $A(x)=0$ for $x<0$, and let \[ \mathcal L_A(t):=\int_{[0,\infty)} e^{-tx}\,dA(x)\qquad(t>0) \] be its Laplace--Stieltjes transform. Suppose that for some $\rho>0$ and slowly varying $\ell$, \[ \mathcal L_A(t)\sim C\,t^{-\rho}\,\ell(1/t)\qquad(t\to 0^+). \] Then \[ A(x)\sim \frac{C}{\Gamma(\rho+1)}\,x^{\rho}\,\ell(x)\qquad(x\to\infty). \] (See, e.g., Bingham--Goldie--Teugels, Regular Variation, or Feller, vol. II, Tauberian theorems chapter.)
In our setting, $A(x)=\sum_{m\le x}a_m$ is nondecreasing and \[ G(t)=\sum_{m\ge 1}a_m e^{-tm}=\int_{[0,\infty)} e^{-tx}\,dA(x), \] so $G(t)$ is exactly the Laplace--Stieltjes transform of $A$. Lemma 66.5 gives \[ G(t)\sim \sqrt{L}\,t^{-1/2}\,\ell(1/t),\qquad \ell(u):=\sqrt{\log u}, \] with $\rho=1/2$ and slowly varying $\ell$. Applying Karamata yields \[ A(x)\sim \frac{\sqrt{L}}{\Gamma(3/2)}\,x^{1/2}\,\sqrt{\log x}. \] Since $\Gamma(3/2)=\tfrac{\sqrt\pi}{2}$, this becomes \[ A(x)\sim 2\sqrt{\frac{L}{\pi}}\,\sqrt{x\log x}. \] Squaring and dividing by $x\log x$ gives the equivalent limit $A(x)^2/(x\log x)\to 4L/\pi$. ∎
6) ADVERSARIAL VERIFICATION
- Ordered vs unordered representations. The identity $F(t)=G(t)^2$ uses ordered convolution. If one used unordered representations, $F(t)$ would instead correspond to $(G(t)^2+G(2t))/2$; constants would change. Round 1 and this round consistently use ordered pairs.
- Asymptotic of $\sum (\log n)e^{-tn}$. Lemma 66.3 only needs a leading term. The discretization error is at most $O(\log(1/t))$, far smaller than the main term $(1/t)\log(1/t)$, so the $\sim$ claim is stable.
- Taking square roots. For $t>0$, $G(t)\ge 0$ and $F(t)=G(t)^2$, so $G(t)=\sqrt{F(t)}$ with no sign ambiguity.
- Karamata hypotheses. The function $A(x)$ is nondecreasing and right-continuous; $\ell(u)=\sqrt{\log u}$ is slowly varying. Also $\rho=1/2>0$, so the theorem applies.
- Boundary cases. If $L=0$ the same method gives $G(t)=o(t^{-1/2}\sqrt{\log(1/t)})$, hence $A(x)=o(\sqrt{x\log x})$, consistent with Round 1. If $L=\infty$ the method is inapplicable; the statement of the problem asks $L$ finite.
7) FINAL (EXACTLY ONE)
UNRESOLVED (BUT STRICTLY ADVANCED).Round 2 closes a concrete Round 1 gap: under the existence of a finite nonzero limit $r(n)/\log n\to L$, the counting function must satisfy the precise asymptotic \[ A(x)\sim 2\sqrt{\frac{L}{\pi}}\,\sqrt{x\log x}, \] which is substantially stronger than $A(x)=\Theta(\sqrt{x\log x})$.
The core existence/nonexistence question remains open: I did not derive a contradiction nor construct such an $A$.
8) COMPLETION ESTIMATE (MANDATORY)
COMPLETION: 40%9) REFERENCES
- N. H. Bingham, C. M. Goldie, J. L. Teugels, Regular Variation, Cambridge Univ. Press (for Karamata Tauberian theorem, Laplace-transform form).
- W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II (Tauberian theorems chapter).