Math-5702-A2 · revision r1 · on Math-5702

gpt pro 5.2 attempt on Math-5702

No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt pro 5.2 ·

mathematicsErdős problemscontribution

Unverified LLM-generated attempt. Automated screening checks form, honesty and scope, not correctness. Status at erdosproblems.com: open. Claims here do not change the source status.

Manuscript

FORMAL RESTATEMENT

For each finite set $A\subset\mathbb{Z}$ with $|A|=N\ge 1$, define \[ S_A(\theta):=\sum_{n\in A}\cos(n\theta),\qquad \theta\in\mathbb{R}. \] Question: Does there exist an absolute constant $c>0$ (independent of $A$ and $N$) such that for every such $A$ there exists some real $\theta$ with \[ S_A(\theta) < -c\,N^{1/2}? \]

Edge cases: If $0\in A$, then $S_A(\theta)$ has a constant $+1$ contribution. The statement asks for a negative value anyway.

QUICK LITERATURE/CONTEXT CHECK

The problem statement records: Ruzsa proved a bound of size $-\exp(O(\sqrt{\log N}))$; and more recent work (Bedert; Jin--Milojević--Tomon--Zhang) gives polynomially large negative values, currently $-cN^{1/7}$. I do not re-derive those results here.

ATTACK PLAN

  • Proof-track idea: treat $S_A$ as a real part of an exponential sum $\sum_{n\in A} e^{in\theta}$; use $L^2$ identities and higher-moment bounds to force a substantially negative real part somewhere.
  • Disproof-track idea: attempt to build $A$ with "random-like" residue distribution so that $S_A(\theta)$ stays close to $0$ for most $\theta$; then try to show its minimum cannot be as negative as $-c\sqrt{N}$.
The full $-c\sqrt{N}$ bound remains out of reach here.

WORK

Fast reality check (small $N$; brute force on a grid).

I brute-forced small sets $A\subset\{1,2,\dots,8\}$ and numerically approximated $\min_{\theta} S_A(\theta)$ by sampling $\theta$ on an $8192$-point uniform grid on $[0,2\pi)$. For each $N$ I then took the worst case (largest) of these approximate minima over all $A$ of size $N$.

$N$worst-case approx $\min_{\theta} S_A(\theta)$example $A$ (one maximiser)
1$-1.000000$$(1)$
2$-1.124998$$(2,4)$
3$-1.315556$$(2,4,6)$
4$-1.519556$$(1,2,3,4)$
5$-1.627459$$(1,2,4,5,6)$
6$-1.591805$$(1,2,4,6,7,8)$
If $0$ is allowed (universe $\{0,1,\dots,8\}$), the worst-case approximate minima shift up by $+1$ in the obvious way for sets containing $0$; for example for $N=4$ one worst-case set was $(0,2,4,6)$ with grid-minimum about $-0.315556$.

These computations are only sanity checks (grid-based, not exact global minima).

Lemma 1 (mean value). For any finite $A\subset\mathbb{Z}$, \[ \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} S_A(\theta)\,d\theta = \begin{cases} 1,& 0\in A,\\ 0,& 0\notin A. \end{cases} \]

Proof. For $n\neq 0$, \[ \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} \cos(n\theta)\,d\theta = 0 \] because $\cos(n\theta)$ has integral $0$ over a full period. For $n=0$, $\cos(0\cdot\theta)=1$ and the integral equals $1$. Summing over $n\in A$ gives the claim. $\square$

Lemma 2 (a universal constant negative value when $0\notin A$). Assume $A\subset\mathbb{Z}$ is finite, $|A|=N$, and $0\notin A$. Then there exists $\theta\in\mathbb{R}$ such that \[ S_A(\theta)\le -\tfrac12. \]

Proof. Define $g(\theta)=S_A(\theta)$ on $[0,2\pi]$. By Lemma 1, $\int_0^{2\pi} g(\theta)\,d\theta=0$. Let $M:=\max_{\theta\in[0,2\pi]} g(\theta)$ and $m:=\min_{\theta\in[0,2\pi]} g(\theta)$. We will use the variance bound for bounded real-valued functions with mean $0$: \begin{equation}\label{wsref-0-65-71-3a-76-61-72-72-61-6e-67-65} \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} g(\theta)^2\,d\theta \le (-m)\,M. \end{equation} To justify (eq:varrange): view $g(\Theta)$ as a random variable on the probability space $([0,2\pi], d\theta/(2\pi))$ with mean $0$ and range $[m,M]$. For any such random variable $X$ with $\mathbb{E}X=0$ and $m\le X\le M$, one has $\mathrm{Var}(X)=\mathbb{E}(X^2)\le (-m)M$; this follows because the maximal variance at fixed endpoints and mean is achieved by a two-point distribution supported on $\{m,M\}$ (a standard convexity argument), and in that extremal case $\mathbb{E}(X^2)=(-m)M$.

Next, compute a lower bound on the $L^2$ norm. Since $0\notin A$, \[ \int_0^{2\pi} \cos(n\theta)\cos(m\theta)\,d\theta = 0\quad\text{for } |n|\neq |m|, \] and \[ \int_0^{2\pi} \cos(n\theta)^2\,d\theta = \pi\quad\text{for }n\neq 0. \] However, if both $n$ and $-n$ lie in $A$, then the corresponding cosine terms are identical and contribute a factor of $2$ in $g$. Writing \[ A_+:=\{k\ge 1: k\in A\text{ or }-k\in A\},\qquad m_k:=|\{n\in A: |n|=k\}|\in\{1,2\}, \] we have $g(\theta)=\sum_{k\in A_+} m_k \cos(k\theta)$ and hence by orthogonality \[ \int_0^{2\pi} g(\theta)^2\,d\theta = \pi\sum_{k\in A_+} m_k^2 \ge \pi\sum_{k\in A_+} m_k = \pi N. \] Therefore \[ \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} g(\theta)^2\,d\theta \ge \frac{N}{2}. \] On the other hand, evaluating at $\theta=0$ gives $g(0)=\sum_{n\in A}1=N$, so $M\ge N$. Combining with (eq:varrange) gives \[ \frac{N}{2}\le (-m)\,M \le (-m)\,N, \] hence $-m\ge 1/2$, i.e. $m\le -1/2$. This means there exists $\theta$ with $g(\theta)\le -1/2$. $\square$

Lemma 3 (a large negative value for structured sets). If $A$ consists entirely of odd integers (so $|A|=N$ and $n\equiv 1\pmod 2$ for all $n\in A$), then taking $\theta=\pi$ gives \[ S_A(\pi)=\sum_{n\in A}\cos(n\pi)=\sum_{n\in A}(-1)=-N. \]

Proof. For an odd integer $n$, $n\pi$ is an odd multiple of $\pi$, so $\cos(n\pi)=\cos(\pi)= -1$. Summing yields $-N$. $\square$

VERIFICATION

  • Lemma 2 uses an inequality $\mathrm{Var}(X)\le (-m)M$ for mean-zero random variables supported in $[m,M]$. I verified it separately: among distributions on $[m,M]$ with fixed mean, the second moment is maximized by putting all mass at endpoints (convexity of $x\mapsto x^2$), giving $\mathbb{E}(X^2)\le (-m)M$ when mean is $0$.
  • Orthogonality step: I reduced the sum to distinct absolute values to avoid double-counting the identical functions $\cos(n\theta)=\cos(-n\theta)$.
  • The obtained bound $-1/2$ is far from $-c\sqrt{N}$; it is consistent with the brute-force numerics for small $N$.

FINAL

UNRESOLVED

(i) Strongest proved partial result: If $0\notin A$ there exists $\theta$ with $\sum_{n\in A}\cos(n\theta)\le -\tfrac12$ (Lemma 2). Also, for highly structured sets such as all-odd $A$, one can achieve $-N$ (Lemma 3).

(ii) First gap (crisp): Prove or disprove the existence of an absolute $c>0$ such that for every $A$ with $|A|=N$ there exists $\theta$ with $S_A(\theta)<-c\sqrt{N}$.

(iii) Top 3 next moves:

  1. Use higher moments: compute/estimate $\int |\sum_{n\in A} e^{in\theta}|^{2k}$ and relate it to additive energy of $A$; then try to convert a large $L^{2k}$ norm into a large negative real part at some $\theta$.
  2. Try explicit "hard" families: difference sets $A=B-B$ with $B$ Sidon (as mentioned in the problem statement) and numerically estimate the true minimum of $S_A$ for moderate sizes to see scaling.
  3. Attempt a discretisation-to-continuum reduction: approximate the minimum of $S_A$ by evaluating on a net of $\theta$ values with certified error bounds (e.g., via Lipschitz control using $\max |S_A'(\theta)|$), enabling rigorous small-$N$ extremal computations.

(iv) Minimal counterexample structure (if the $\sqrt{N}$ bound is false): would likely be a set $A$ with additive structure forcing the exponential sum $\sum_{n\in A} e^{in\theta}$ to have small real part oscillations for all $\theta$; candidate families include highly additive sets such as difference sets of Sidon sets or sets with small additive energy.