GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-790
mathematicsErdős problemscontributionManuscript
Contents
Problem 383: auditing smooth intervals and their immediate endpoints
1) OBJECTIVE AND SOURCE REVIEW
Attempt dated 2026-09-23. The target described in383.tex, read completely, asks for arbitrarily long, and ultimately infinitely many for each fixed length, intervals beginning at a prime square with largest prime factor equal to that prime. The source supplies certificates through length nine. I recheck all of them and try the immediate extension of each certificate. This produces verified boundaries, not a new length-ten example. 2) WORK
For each source pair $(p,k)=(510569,7),(2869123,8),(3092701,9)$, the verification program multiplies every displayed factor list, tests $p$ and every listed factor for primality by exhaustive trial division up to its integer square root, and checks that all factors of $p^2+i$, $1\le i\le k$, are less than $p$. All 24 displayed factorizations pass. Thus all three source certificates are valid.Factoring the next integer shows that none of these particular primes gives a longer interval: \[ \begin{split} 510569^2+8&=3^2\cdot419\cdot69127739,\\ 2869123^2+9&=2\cdot4115933394569,\\ 3092701^2+10&=23\cdot211\cdot1970904487. \end{split} \] All displayed factors in these three new factorizations were tested prime by the same deterministic method, and in each row the largest factor exceeds $p$.
A simple necessary filter for future searches is worth making explicit. If $p^2+i$ is $p$-smooth for any $i>0$, then its number $\Omega(p^2+i)$ of prime factors counted with multiplicity is at least three. Otherwise it is the product of at most two primes at most $p$ and hence is at most $p^2$, a contradiction. Moreover, for odd $p$, every odd prime divisor $q$ of $p^2+1$ satisfies $q\equiv1\pmod4$: the nonzero residue $p\bmod q$ squares to $-1$, so its multiplicative order is four and divides $q-1$. These are necessary filters, not sufficient smoothness criteria.
3) ADVERSARIAL VERIFICATION
Checking factor products alone would not certify the claimed prime factors; explicit primality checks were also executed. Conversely, the primality of the large next-step factors is needed to exclude smoothness, and was not assumed from their size. The interval from $p^2$ through $p^2+k$ contains $k+1$ integers, so the convention here counts the $k$ increments after the square. A single example for a fixed $k$ does not establish infinitude for that $k$.4) FINAL
UNRESOLVED. The supplied frontier $k=9$ is independently certified, and each supplied example's first failure is explicit. No verified improvement of that frontier or infinitude theorem was obtained.5) SOURCES CHECKED
The complete supplied383.tex; all factor lists and tests are in verification/batch_1_checks.py and its JSON output, executed 2026-09-23. The two search filters are proved directly above.