Math-5608-A2 · revision r1 · on Math-5608

gpt pro 5.2 attempt on Math-5608

No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt pro 5.2 ·

mathematicsErdős problemscontribution

Unverified LLM-generated attempt. Automated screening checks form, honesty and scope, not correctness. Status at erdosproblems.com: open. Claims here do not change the source status.

Manuscript

Contents
  1. Problem 368: Largest prime factor of $n(n+1)$
  2. FORMAL RESTATEMENT
  3. QUICK LITERATURE/CONTEXT CHECK
  4. ATTACK PLAN
  5. WORK (complete proof of (*))
  6. 1. Smooth numbers and reduction to Størmer
  7. Observation 1.1.
  8. 2. A key finiteness lemma for Pell equations
  9. Lemma 2.1 (structure of Pell solutions).
  10. Lemma 2.2 (Størmer's Pell finiteness).
  11. 3. Størmer's theorem for consecutive $S$-smooth integers
  12. Theorem 3.1 (Størmer; difference $1$ case).
  13. 4. Proof that $F(n)\to\infty$
  14. VERIFICATION
  15. META-CHECK (common failure modes)
  16. FINAL
  17. COMPLETION ESTIMATE
  18. Bibliographic pointers (non-exhaustive)
  19. References

Problem 368: Largest prime factor of $n(n+1)$

FORMAL RESTATEMENT

Let \[ F(n) := \max\{p:\ p\text{ prime and }p\mid n(n+1)\}, \] the largest prime divisor of $n(n+1)$.

The prompt asks "How large is $F(n)$?" and then records several known results (e.g. $F(n)\to\infty$, lower bounds, and conjectures).

Ambiguity / minimal correction. "How large" is not a proposition. A precise mathematical statement explicitly present in the prompt is:

(*) $F(n)\to\infty$ as $n\to\infty$.

I will give a complete proof of (*) using Størmer's theorem on consecutive smooth numbers.

QUICK LITERATURE/CONTEXT CHECK

The Erdős-problems page for #368 attributes $F(n)\to\infty$ to Pólya $1918$ and also notes Størmer's earlier work. A standard effective route is Størmer's theorem $1897$ that for any finite set of primes $S$, there are only finitely many pairs of consecutive $S$-smooth integers; an expository proof is given by M. Klazar $2010$ via Pell equations.

ATTACK PLAN

  1. Fix a bound $B$ and let $S$ be the set of primes $\le B$.
  2. Show: if $F(n)\le B$ then both $n$ and $n+1$ are $S$-smooth (all prime factors in $S$).
  3. Apply Størmer's theorem to conclude there are only finitely many such $n$.
  4. Conclude: for each fixed $B$ there exists $N(B)$ such that $n\ge N(B)\Rightarrow F(n)>B$, i.e. $F(n)\to\infty$.

WORK (complete proof of (*))

1. Smooth numbers and reduction to Størmer

Let $S$ be a finite set of primes. Call a positive integer $S$-smooth if all its prime factors lie in $S$.
Observation 1.1.
If $F(n)\le B$ and $S:=\{p\text{ prime}:p\le B\}$, then both $n$ and $n+1$ are $S$-smooth.
Proof: If $F(n)\le B$ then every prime dividing $n(n+1)$ is $\le B$, hence lies in $S$. Since $\gcd(n,n+1)=1$, any prime dividing $n$ (resp. $n+1$) also divides $n(n+1)$, so it lies in $S$. ∎

Thus, to prove $F(n)\to\infty$, it suffices to show:

Claim. For each finite set of primes $S$, there are only finitely many $n$ such that both $n$ and $n+1$ are $S$-smooth.

This is (a special case of) Størmer's theorem. We now prove it.

2. A key finiteness lemma for Pell equations

For $d\in\mathbb{N}$, consider the Pell equation \[ x^2-dy^2=1. \tag{Pell}_d \] Say that $y$ is a $d$-number if every prime factor of $y$ divides $d$.
Lemma 2.1 (structure of Pell solutions).
Assume $d$ is not a perfect square and $(\mathrm{Pell})_d$ has at least one positive integer solution. Let $(a_1,b_1)$ be the fundamental solution, i.e. the solution with $a_1>1$ minimal. Then every positive solution $(a_n,b_n)$ is given by \[ a_n+b_n\sqrt d = (a_1+b_1\sqrt d)^n\qquad(n\ge 1), \] and conversely each $n\ge 1$ produces a positive solution.
Proof: Work in the quadratic ring $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt d]$. If $(x,y)$ solves $(\mathrm{Pell})_d$, then $u:=x+y\sqrt d$ satisfies $N(u)=u\,\overline u=x^2-dy^2=1$, so $u$ is a unit of norm $1$. If $u=x+y\sqrt d$ and $u'=x'+y'\sqrt d$ both have norm $1$, then $uu'$ also has norm $1$, and its coefficients are integers, so solutions form a multiplicative group.

Let $\varepsilon:=a_1+b_1\sqrt d>1$. Then $\varepsilon^n$ has norm $1$ and equals $a_n+b_n\sqrt d$ with integers $a_n,b_n$ (by repeated multiplication), so each $n$ yields a solution.

Conversely, let $u=x+y\sqrt d>1$ be any solution. Choose $n\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $\varepsilon^n\le u<\varepsilon^{n+1}$. Then $v:=u/\varepsilon^n$ is again a unit of norm $1$, and satisfies $1\le v<\varepsilon$. Writing $v=r+s\sqrt d$ with $r,s\in\mathbb{Z}$ (closure under multiplication and inversion in this unit group), the inequalities $1\le v<\varepsilon$ force $s=0$ and $r=1$ (since $|r-s\sqrt d|=|\overline v|=1/v\le 1$ and $r,s$ are integers). Hence $v=1$ and $u=\varepsilon^n$. Therefore every solution is a power of the fundamental unit. ∎

Lemma 2.2 (Størmer's Pell finiteness).
For fixed $d\in\mathbb{N}$, the Pell equation $(\mathrm{Pell})_d$ has at most one positive integer solution $(x,y)$ for which $y$ is a $d$-number.
Proof: If $(\mathrm{Pell})_d$ has no positive solutions, there is nothing to prove. Otherwise let $(a_1,b_1)$ be its fundamental solution and write all solutions as in Lemma 2.1. Suppose for some $m\ge 1$ the solution $(a_m,b_m)$ has $b_m$ a $d$-number. We will show $m=1$.

Step 1: basic coprimality. From $a_1^2-db_1^2=1$, any common divisor of $a_1$ and $d$ must divide $1$, so $\gcd(a_1,d)=1$ and in particular $a_1>1$.

Step 2: divisibility in the $b_n$ sequence. For $n=kl$ we have \[ a_{kl}+b_{kl}\sqrt d = (a_k+b_k\sqrt d)^l. \] Expanding the right-hand side by the binomial theorem, every term contributing to the $\sqrt d$-coefficient contains a factor $b_k$, so $b_k\mid b_{kl}$. In particular, taking $k=1$ shows $b_1\mid b_n$ for all $n$, so we may write \[ b_n=b_1c_n\qquad (c_n\in\mathbb{N}). \] Moreover, for any $l\ge 1$, dividing the binomial expansion for $(a_1+b_1\sqrt d)^l$ by $b_1$ yields the explicit identity \[ c_l = l a_1^{l-1} + \binom{l}{3} a_1^{l-3} b_1^2 d + \binom{l}{5} a_1^{l-5} b_1^4 d^2 + \cdots, \tag{1} \] a sum over odd indices.

Step 3: prime divisors of $m$ lead to contradiction. Assume for contradiction that $m>1$. Let $p$ be any prime divisor of $m$, and write $m=pr$. Then $b_p\mid b_m$, hence $c_p=b_p/b_1\mid b_m$. Since $b_m$ is a $d$-number, every prime factor of $c_p$ divides $d$, i.e. $c_p$ is a $d$-number. We now show this is impossible for any prime $p$.

Case $p=2$. From $1$ with $l=2$ we have $c_2=2a_1$. If $c_2$ is a $d$-number, every prime factor of $a_1$ divides $d$, contradicting $\gcd(a_1,d)=1$ unless $a_1=1$. But $a_1>1$, contradiction.

Case $p=3$. From $1$ with $l=3$ we get \[ c_3 = 3a_1^2 + b_1^2 d. \] Using $a_1^2-db_1^2=1$ we rewrite $b_1^2 d=a_1^2-1$, hence \[ c_3 = 4a_1^2-1=(2a_1-1)(2a_1+1). \] Let $q$ be any prime divisor of $c_3$. Since $c_3$ is a $d$-number, $q\mid d$. Reducing $c_3=3a_1^2+b_1^2d$ modulo $q$ gives $0\equiv 3a_1^2\pmod q$. As $\gcd(a_1,q)=1$ (because $q\mid d$ and $\gcd(a_1,d)=1$), we conclude $q=3$. So $c_3$ is a power of $3$, meaning both $2a_1-1$ and $2a_1+1$ are powers of $3$ differing by $2$. The only positive powers of $3$ differing by $2$ are $1$ and $3$, which forces $a_1=1$, contradiction.

Case $p\ge 5$. Let $q$ be any prime divisor of $c_p$. Again $c_p$ is a $d$-number, so $q\mid d$. Reduce identity $1$ modulo $q$ with $l=p$: all terms after the first contain a factor $d$, hence vanish modulo $q$, so \[ 0\equiv c_p \equiv p a_1^{p-1}\pmod q. \] Since $\gcd(a_1,q)=1$, this implies $q\mid p$, so $q=p$. Thus every prime factor of $c_p$ is $p$, so $c_p=p^r$ for some $r\ge 1$. In particular $p\mid c_p$, hence $p\mid d$. Now in $1$ with $l=p$, every term after the first is divisible by $p^2$ because it has a factor $d$ (hence $p$) and a binomial coefficient $\binom{p}{j}$ (hence $p$). Therefore $c_p > p a_1^{p-1}$ (since all summands are positive), and because $a_1\ge 2$ we have $p a_1^{p-1}\ge p\cdot 2^{p-1} > p$. So $c_p>p$, contradicting $c_p=p^r$ with $r=1$, and also contradicting $r\ge 2$ because then $c_p\ge p^2$ would force $p^2\mid p a_1^{p-1}$ and hence $p\mid a_1$, again contradicting $\gcd(a_1,d)=1$.

In all cases we obtain a contradiction, so $m$ has no prime divisors, hence $m=1$. Thus the only solution with $y$ a $d$-number is the fundamental one, proving uniqueness. ∎

3. Størmer's theorem for consecutive $S$-smooth integers

Theorem 3.1 (Størmer; difference $1$ case).
Let $S=\{p_1,\dots,p_r\}$ be a finite set of primes. Then the equation \[ x-y=1 \] has only finitely many solutions in positive $S$-smooth integers $x,y$. In fact, there are at most $3^r$ such solutions.
Proof: If $2\notin S$, then every $S$-smooth integer is odd, so no two can differ by $1$. So assume $2\in S$.

Let $y$ be $S$-smooth and set $a:=2y+1$. If also $y+1$ is $S$-smooth then $4y(y+1)$ is $S$-smooth, and \[ 4y(y+1)=(2y+1)^2-1=a^2-1. \] So it suffices to bound the number of $S$-smooth integers of the form $a^2-1$.

Write $a^2-1=\prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i}$. Define integers $b_i\ge 0$ by:

  • if $e_i$ is odd, set $b_i:=e_i-1$ (so $e_i-b_i=1$);
  • if $e_i\in\{0,2\}$, set $b_i:=0$ (so $e_i-b_i\in\{0,2\}$);
  • if $e_i\ge 4$ is even, set $b_i:=e_i-2$ (so $e_i-b_i=2$).
Then set \[ d:=\prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{e_i-b_i},\qquad b:=\prod_{i=1}^r p_i^{b_i/2}. \] By construction, $e_i-b_i\in\{0,1,2\}$, so there are at most $3^r$ possible values of $d$. Also $a^2-1=db^2$, i.e. $a^2-d b^2=1$, and whenever $b_i>0$ we have $e_i-b_i=2$, so $p_i\mid d$. Thus every prime dividing $b$ divides $d$, i.e. $b$ is a $d$-number.

For each fixed $d$, Lemma 2.2 shows there is at most one positive solution $(a,b)$ to $a^2-d b^2=1$ with $b$ a $d$-number. Hence there are at most $3^r$ possible values of $a$, and therefore at most $3^r$ possible values of $y=(a-1)/2$. This proves finiteness. ∎

4. Proof that $F(n)\to\infty$

Fix $B\ge 2$ and set $S:=\{p\text{ prime}:p\le B\}$. If $F(n)\le B$, Observation 1.1 implies $n$ and $n+1$ are both $S$-smooth. By Theorem 3.1, there are only finitely many such $n$. Therefore for each $B$ there exists $N(B)$ such that $n\ge N(B)\Rightarrow F(n)>B$. This is exactly the statement that $F(n)\to\infty$ as $n\to\infty$.

VERIFICATION

  • The reduction $F(n)\le B\Rightarrow n,n+1\text{ are }S\text{-smooth}$ used only $\gcd(n,n+1)=1$.
  • Lemma 2.2 was proved by contradiction using only integer divisibility and the explicit binomial expansion identity $1$.
  • The final quantifier structure matches the limit definition: for each fixed $B$ only finitely many exceptions.

META-CHECK (common failure modes)

  • Confusing "unbounded" with "tends to infinity": we proved the stronger statement "for each $B$ only finitely many $n$ have $F(n)\le B$", which implies $F(n)\to\infty$.
  • Hidden use of deep theorems: the argument uses only Pell-equation structure and elementary divisibility (no Baker theory, etc.).
  • Ring issues for Pell: we only used closure of $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt d]$ under multiplication and the norm map.

FINAL

FINAL: LABEL: FULL SOLUTION   SUBLABEL: FULL PROOF.

COMPLETION ESTIMATE

COMPLETION ESTIMATE: 100%.

Bibliographic pointers (non-exhaustive)

References

  • [KlazarStormer] M. Klazar, Størmer's solution of the unit equation $x-y=1$, 2010,
    https://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~klazar/stormer.pdf.
  • [Polya1918] G. Pólya, Zur arithmetischen Untersuchung der Polynome, Math. Z. 1 $1918$, 143--148.
  • [OEISA060355] OEIS Foundation, A060355: Numbers $k$ such that $k$ and $k+1$ are powerful,
    https://oeis.org/A060355.
  • [OEISA074399] OEIS Foundation, A074399: $a(n)$ is the largest prime divisor of $n(n+1)$,
    https://oeis.org/A074399.