Math-719-A3 · revision r1 · on Math-719

gpt pro 5.4 attempt on Math-719

No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt pro 5.4 ·

mathematicsErdős problemscontribution

Unverified LLM-generated attempt. Automated screening checks form, honesty and scope, not correctness. Status at erdosproblems.com: open. Claims here do not change the source status.

Manuscript

Contents
  1. Erdős Problem #213 (Round 2)
  2. 1. ROUND-2 OBJECTIVE
  3. 2. Round-1 FOUNDATION USED
  4. 3. NEW INSIGHT / TOOL (ROUND 2)
  5. 4. ATTACK PLAN (ROUND 2)
  6. 5. WORK (ROUND 2)
  7. 6. ADVERSARIAL VERIFICATION
  8. 7. FINAL
  9. 8. COMPLETION ESTIMATE
  10. 9. REFERENCES

Erdős Problem #213 (Round 2)

Question recalled. For each $n\geq 4$, do there exist $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^2$, no three on a line and no four on a circle, such that all pairwise distances are integers?

1. ROUND-2 OBJECTIVE

Path C: obstruction/structure plus exact verification. Round 1 already had an explicit $4$-point example and had recorded a $7$-point configuration from Kreisel--Kurz, but the $7$-point example was not fully verified and no common structure theorem had been proved. The most promising strict advance is therefore to do two things: prove the standard quadratic-field/characteristic theorem for planar integral point sets, and then turn the recorded $7$-point coordinates into a complete exact proof. This immediately upgrades existence from one hand-checked example at $n=4$ to a rigorously verified existence theorem for every $n\leq 7$.

2. Round-1 FOUNDATION USED

I use the following Round-1 material.
  1. Proposition 4.1: an explicit $4$-point general-position integral set.
  2. Proposition 4.2: the coordinates of a $7$-point integral set from Kreisel--Kurz were already recorded.
  3. The Round-1 gap statement: there was no proof that the $7$-point coordinates really satisfy all $21$ integrality conditions and all general-position checks.

3. NEW INSIGHT / TOOL (ROUND 2)

There are two new pieces of mathematics in this round.
  1. A common characteristic theorem: every non-collinear planar integral point set lies, after normalization, in one quadratic field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{k})$, and all its nondegenerate triangles have the same characteristic.
  2. A full exact certificate for the Kreisel--Kurz heptagon: all $21$ pairwise distances are listed explicitly, and the no-three-collinear / no-four-concyclic conditions are checked by exact determinant tests in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2002})$.

4. ATTACK PLAN (ROUND 2)

Round 1 left two exact gaps.
  1. It had no structural theorem explaining why the $7$-point coordinates live in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2002})$.
  2. It had no rigorous verification of the full $7$-point example.
So I first prove the characteristic theorem, which sharpens the search space for any future $8$-point construction. I then use exact symbolic computation in the field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2002})$ to certify all pairwise distances and all general-position conditions for the recorded heptagon.

5. WORK (ROUND 2)

Definition 5.1 (characteristic of an integral triangle). Let $\triangle XYZ$ be a nondegenerate triangle with integer side lengths. By Heron's formula, its area can be written uniquely in the form \[ \operatorname{Area}(\triangle XYZ)=q\sqrt{k}, \] where $q\in \mathbb{Q}_{>0}$ and $k$ is a squarefree positive integer. The integer $k$ is called the characteristic of the triangle.

Theorem 5.2 (common characteristic theorem). Let $S$ be a non-collinear integral point set in the plane. Then there exists a squarefree integer $k>0$ and a Euclidean motion of the plane such that every point of $S$ has coordinates \[ (r_1,r_2\sqrt{k}) \qquad (r_1,r_2\in \mathbb{Q}). \] In particular, every nondegenerate triangle determined by $S$ has characteristic $k$.

Proof. Choose a non-collinear triple $A,B,C\in S$. After translation and rotation we may assume \[ A=(0,0), \qquad B=(d,0), \] where $d=|AB|\in \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$.

Let $P=(x,y)\in S$. Since the distances $|PA|$ and $|PB|$ are integers, say \[ |PA|=a,\qquad |PB|=b, \] we have \[ x^2+y^2=a^2,\qquad (x-d)^2+y^2=b^2. \] Subtracting gives \[ x=\frac{a^2-b^2+d^2}{2d}\in \mathbb{Q}, \] and hence \[ y^2=a^2-x^2\in \mathbb{Q}. \]

Now write \[ C=(u,v),\qquad v\neq 0. \] As above, $u\in \mathbb{Q}$ and $v^2\in \mathbb{Q}_{>0}$, so \[ v=r\sqrt{k} \] for some $r\in \mathbb{Q}_{\neq 0}$ and some squarefree integer $k>0$.

Take any point $P=(x,y)\in S$. Since $|PC|$ is an integer, \[ |PC|^2=(x-u)^2+(y-v)^2 \] is rational. Expanding, \[ (x-u)^2+y^2+v^2-2yv\in \mathbb{Q}. \] The first three terms are rational, so $2yv\in \mathbb{Q}$. Because $v=r\sqrt{k}$ with $r\neq 0$ rational, it follows that \[ y\in \mathbb{Q}\sqrt{k}. \] Thus every point of $S$ has coordinates in $\mathbb{Q}\times \mathbb{Q}\sqrt{k}$.

Finally, the area of any nondegenerate triangle with vertices in $S$ is \[ \frac12\left| \det\begin{pmatrix}x_1&y_1&1\\x_2&y_2&1\\x_3&y_3&1\end{pmatrix}\right|, \] hence a rational multiple of $\sqrt{k}$. Therefore every nondegenerate triangle in $S$ has characteristic $k$. $\square$

Proposition 5.3 (exact verification of the Kreisel--Kurz heptagon). Let $\omega=\sqrt{2002}$ and define \[ \begin{array}{rcl} P_1&=&(0,0),\\[2mm] P_2&=&(22270,0),\\[2mm] P_3&=&\left(\dfrac{26127018}{2227}, \dfrac{932064}{2227}\,\omega\right),\\[3mm] P_4&=&\left(\dfrac{245363}{17}, \dfrac{3144}{17}\,\omega\right),\\[3mm] P_5&=&\left(\dfrac{17615968}{2227}, \dfrac{238464}{2227}\,\omega\right),\\[3mm] P_6&=&\left(\dfrac{56068}{17}, \dfrac{3144}{17}\,\omega\right),\\[3mm] P_7&=&\left(\dfrac{19079044}{2227}, -\dfrac{54168}{2227}\,\omega\right). \end{array} \] Then:

  1. all $21$ pairwise distances are integers;
  2. no three of the points are collinear;
  3. no four of the points are concyclic.

Proof. All calculations are exact in the quadratic field $K=\mathbb{Q}(\omega)$.

Step 1: all pairwise distances are integers. A direct exact simplification of the $21$ squared distances gives the following distance table: \[ \begin{array}{c|cccccc} & P_2 & P_3 & P_4 & P_5 & P_6 & P_7\\ \hline P_1 & 22270 & 22098 & 16637 & 9248 & 8908 & 8636\\ P_2 & & 21488 & 11397 & 15138 & 20698 & 13746\\ P_3 & & & 10795 & 14450 & 13430 & 20066\\ P_4 & & & & 7395 & 11135 & 11049\\ P_5 & & & & & 5780 & 5916\\ P_6 & & & & & & 10744 \end{array} \] Hence every pairwise distance is an integer.

Step 2: no three points are collinear. For distinct $i,j,k$, three points are collinear if and only if \[ \Delta_{ijk}:=\det\begin{pmatrix} x_i & y_i & 1\\ x_j & y_j & 1\\ x_k & y_k & 1 \end{pmatrix}=0. \] Each $\Delta_{ijk}$ lies in $K=\mathbb{Q}(\omega)$. Expanding every determinant in the basis $\{1,\omega\}$, an exact check shows that for all \[ 1\leq i<j<k\leq 7 \] the pair of coefficients is not $(0,0)$. Therefore all $35$ determinants $\Delta_{ijk}$ are nonzero, so no three points are collinear.

Step 3: no four points are concyclic. Four points are concyclic if and only if the determinant \[ \Gamma_{ijkl}:=\det\begin{pmatrix} x_i & y_i & x_i^2+y_i^2 & 1\\ x_j & y_j & x_j^2+y_j^2 & 1\\ x_k & y_k & x_k^2+y_k^2 & 1\\ x_l & y_l & x_l^2+y_l^2 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \] vanishes. Again every $\Gamma_{ijkl}$ lies in $K$, and an exact expansion in the basis $\{1,\omega\}$ shows that all \[ \binom{7}{4}=35 \] such determinants are nonzero. Hence no four points are concyclic.

This proves the proposition. $\square$

Corollary 5.4. For every integer $n$ with $4\leq n\leq 7$, there exists a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^2$, no three on a line and no four on a circle, such that all pairwise distances are integers.

Proof. For $n=4$, use the Round-1 construction. For $5\leq n\leq 7$, take any $n$-point subset of the heptagon in Proposition 5.3. Pairwise integrality and the two general-position conditions are hereditary under taking subsets. $\square$

6. ADVERSARIAL VERIFICATION

The new work was checked against the main possible defects.
  1. Common characteristic theorem. The proof really uses non-collinearity only once, namely to guarantee a point with nonzero $y$-coordinate after normalization. This is valid because the problem concerns general-position sets.
  2. Exactness versus numerics. All computations for Proposition 5.3 were exact, not floating-point. Equality in $K=\mathbb{Q}(\omega)$ was tested by comparing the coefficients of $1$ and $\omega$.
  3. Subset argument. Distances remain integers on subsets, and any collinear triple or concyclic quadruple in a subset would already violate general position in the full $7$-point set.
  4. Interpretation of the field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2002})$. Theorem 5.2 explains why the coordinates of a planar integral point set naturally live in a common quadratic field, so the appearance of $\sqrt{2002}$ is structural rather than accidental.

7. FINAL

UNRESOLVED (BUT STRICTLY ADVANCED).

The Round-2 gains over Round 1 are:

  1. A full proof of the common characteristic theorem for planar integral point sets.
  2. A complete exact verification of the recorded $7$-point Kreisel--Kurz construction.
  3. Consequently, a rigorous existence theorem for every $n\leq 7$.

The first unresolved case remains $n=8$.

8. COMPLETION ESTIMATE

COMPLETION: 55%

9. REFERENCES

  1. T. Kreisel and S. Kurz, There are integral heptagons, no three points on a line, no four on a circle, Discrete Comput. Geom. 39 $2008$, 786--790.
  2. T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #213, problem page accessed 2026-03-07.