Math-705-A2 · revision r1 · on Math-705

gpt pro 5.2 attempt on Math-705

No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt pro 5.2 ·

mathematicsErdős problemscontribution

Unverified LLM-generated attempt. Automated screening checks form, honesty and scope, not correctness. Status at erdosproblems.com: open. Claims here do not change the source status.

Manuscript

Contents
  1. 1) FORMAL RESTATEMENT
  2. 2) QUICK LITERATURE/CONTEXT CHECK
  3. 3) ATTACK PLAN
  4. 4) WORK
  5. Lemma 4.1 (monochromatic copies inside a single strip)
  6. Lemma 4.2 (minimal vertical span of an equilateral triangle)
  7. Corollary 4.3 (small equilateral triangles always appear in strip coloring)
  8. 5) VERIFICATION
  9. 6) FINAL

PROBLEM

In any $2$-colouring of $\mathbb{R}^2$, for all but at most one triangle $T$, there is a monochromatic congruent copy of $T$.

OUTPUT

1) FORMAL RESTATEMENT

A 2-coloring is a map $c:\mathbb R^2\to\{\text{red},\text{blue}\}$.

Two triangles $T,T'$ in $\mathbb R^2$ are congruent if there is an isometry (composition of translation, rotation, reflection) mapping $T$ to $T'$.

Given a triangle $T$, say that $T$ is Ramsey for the coloring $c$ if there exists a monochromatic congruent copy of $T$, i.e. an isometric image $T'$ of $T$ whose three vertices all have the same color.

The statement to prove can be phrased as:

For every 2-coloring $c$ of $\mathbb R^2$, the set of congruence classes of triangles $T$ that are not Ramsey for $c$ has size at most $1$.

The problem text also notes there are colorings (“alternating strips”) where one equilateral triangle must be excluded, and that Shader proved the statement for a fixed right triangle.

---

2) QUICK LITERATURE/CONTEXT CHECK

I will not use or claim any external results beyond what is explicitly written in the problem text.

The problem text reports:

* An alternating-strip coloring can force exclusion of one equilateral triangle. * Shader $1976$ proved the statement for a single right-angled triangle.

---

3) ATTACK PLAN

I do not currently have a route to the full theorem. I instead analyze the simplest cited obstruction mechanism (alternating strip colorings) and prove a couple of precise, elementary geometric facts about when a triangle can be made monochromatic in such a coloring.

---

4) WORK

Lemma 4.1 (monochromatic copies inside a single strip)

Consider the horizontal strip coloring \[ c(x,y)=\begin{cases} \text{red},& y\in [2k,2k+1)\text{ for some }k\in\mathbb Z,\\ \text{blue},& y\in [2k+1,2k+2)\text{ for some }k\in\mathbb Z. \end{cases} \]

If a triangle $T$ has a congruent copy whose three vertices have $y$-coordinates contained in an interval of length $<1$, then $T$ has a monochromatic copy (in fact, entirely red or entirely blue) in this coloring.

Proof. Let $T'$ be a congruent copy of $T$ whose vertex $y$-coordinates are all in some interval $(\alpha,\alpha+1)$ of length $<1$. Choose an integer $k$ so that $(\alpha,\alpha+1)$ lies entirely inside a single color strip, either inside $[2k,2k+1)$ or inside $[2k+1,2k+2)$. (That is always possible because the strip boundaries occur at integers, and any open interval of length $<1$ can be shifted into the interior of one half of a period-2 partition.) Then all three vertices of $T'$ lie in that strip and hence share the same color. $\square$

---

Lemma 4.2 (minimal vertical span of an equilateral triangle)

Let $E_s$ be an equilateral triangle of side length $s>0$. Among all congruent copies of $E_s$ in the plane, the minimal possible difference between the maximum and minimum $y$-coordinates of its vertices equals its altitude \[ h=\frac{\sqrt3}{2}s. \]

Proof. Let $E_1$ be a unit equilateral triangle with vertices $A,B,C$. The three edge directions are separated by $60^\circ$ angles. Fix any placement of $E_1$ and consider the vertical unit direction $u=(0,1)$. For any edge of length $1$ making angle $\phi$ with the horizontal, its vertical projection length is $|\sin\phi|$.

Among the three edge directions of an equilateral triangle, for any given direction $u$, there is an edge whose direction makes angle at most $30^\circ$ from the horizontal-orthogonal direction; equivalently, among the three angles between $u$ and the three edge directions, the minimum is at most $30^\circ$. Therefore for at least one edge $e$ of the triangle, the vertical projection of that edge has length at least $\cos(30^\circ)=\sqrt3/2$.

But the vertical span (max $y$ minus min $y$ among vertices) is at least the vertical projection length of some edge, since that projection is the absolute $y$-difference between its endpoints. Hence the vertical span is always at least $\sqrt3/2$ for the unit triangle.

On the other hand, if one side of the equilateral triangle is placed horizontally, then the third vertex lies exactly $\sqrt3/2$ units above that side, so the vertical span equals $\sqrt3/2$. Thus the minimum possible vertical span for $E_1$ is $\sqrt3/2$. Scaling by factor $s$ multiplies all vertical spans by $s$, so the minimum possible vertical span for $E_s$ is $(\sqrt3/2)s$. $\square$

---

Corollary 4.3 (small equilateral triangles always appear in strip coloring)

In the strip coloring of Lemma 4.1, every equilateral triangle of side length $s<\frac{2}{\sqrt3}$ has a monochromatic congruent copy.

Proof. If $s<2/\sqrt3$, then its altitude $(\sqrt3/2)s<1$. By Lemma 4.2 there is a congruent copy with vertical span $<1$, and then Lemma 4.1 yields a monochromatic copy. $\square$

---

5) VERIFICATION

* Lemma 4.1 is purely geometric and uses only the definition of the strip coloring. * Lemma 4.2 uses the fact that among three directions separated by $60^\circ$, one is within $30^\circ$ of any chosen direction; this implies a projection lower bound. The inequality is tight by the horizontal-side placement. * Corollary 4.3 shows that strip colorings cannot forbid all equilateral triangles; only sufficiently “large” ones could potentially be obstructed.

---

6) FINAL

UNRESOLVED

(i) Strongest fully proved partial result obtained here.

For the standard horizontal alternating-strip 2-coloring, I proved:

* any triangle that can be placed with vertex $y$-coordinates in an interval of length $<1$ has a monochromatic copy (Lemma 4.1); * the minimal possible vertical span of an equilateral triangle of side length $s$ is $(\sqrt3/2)s$ (Lemma 4.2); * consequently, every equilateral triangle with side length $s<2/\sqrt3$ has a monochromatic copy in this strip coloring (Corollary 4.3).

(ii) Exact first gap.

Prove (or disprove) the full statement: in an arbitrary 2-coloring of $\mathbb R^2$, at most one congruence class of triangle fails to have a monochromatic copy. I do not have a mechanism to control arbitrary colorings.

(iii) Top 3 next moves (concrete targets).

1. For strip colorings (and their rotations), determine exactly which triangle shapes/sizes are forbidden and whether exactly one equilateral triangle can be avoided. 2. Prove stability/robustness: show that if two triangle shapes are forbidden then one can derive a contradiction via a geometric configuration forcing both colors. 3. Attempt to extend Shader’s right-triangle argument to general acute/obtuse triangles via decomposition into right triangles or via affine/rotational averaging.

(iv) What a minimal counterexample would likely look like.

A counterexample would be a 2-coloring $c$ and two noncongruent triangles $T_1,T_2$ such that neither has a monochromatic copy. Any such coloring would have to avoid two distinct distance/angle patterns simultaneously; one expects it to be highly structured (e.g., periodic stripes or tilings) rather than random.