GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-6255
mathematicsErdős problemscontributionManuscript
Contents
Erdős Problem 1201 --- GPT 6 Astra Ultra partial attempt
FORMAL RESTATEMENT
Let $P(m)$ denote the greatest prime factor of $m$. For each $\epsilon,\eta>0$, does some integer $k\geq0$ make the set \[\{n\in\mathbb N:P(n(n+1)\cdots(n+k))>n^{1-\epsilon}\}\] have density at least $1-\eta$?CONTEXT AND SCOPE
This replaces the earlier statement-only record with an elementary mathematical attempt. The arguments below establish only their stated partial results; no novelty or full solution is claimed.The page does not specify lower density versus existence of natural density; this paraphrase preserves its word density without silently choosing a stronger convention. The official remarks record the epsilon=1/2 case.
ATTACK PLAN AND WORK
The failure condition has a useful exact finite-word formulation. Fix $0<\epsilon<1$, an integer $k\ge0$, and a dyadic block of starting points $N\le n<2N$. Put $y=(2N+k)^{1-\epsilon}$ and mark each integer in $[N,2N+k-1]$ whose prime factors are all at most $y$. If a starting point fails the desired prime-factor inequality, then all $n,n+1,\ldots,n+k$ are marked, because their prime factors are at most $n^{1-\epsilon}\le y$.If the maximal consecutive runs of marked entries have lengths $L_1,L_2,\ldots$, the exact number of fully marked windows of length $k+1$ is \[\sum_j\max(0,L_j-k).\tag{1}\] Every such window lies inside one run and there are $L_j-k$ possible starts in a run of length at least $k+1$. The word has length $N+k$, so its $N$ possible window starts are exactly the desired dyadic block. Thus the proportion of actual failures is at most $1$ divided by $N$.
This identifies a sufficient quantitative route: make the normalized excess mass of long smooth runs arbitrarily small, with one fixed $k$ working in every sufficiently large block. Marginal smooth-number density alone gives no such run-length estimate. For $\epsilon\ge1$ the question is trivial with $k=0$ and $n\ge2$, since the threshold is at most one; that observation does not address the difficult small-$\epsilon$ regime.