gpt pro 5.2 attempt on Math-6110
mathematicsErdős problemscontributionManuscript
Contents
FORMAL RESTATEMENT.
Fix an integer $k\ge 2$. Does there exist a prime $p$ and consecutive nonempty integer intervals $I_1,\dots,I_k$ such that \[ \prod_{n\in I_i} n \equiv 1 \pmod p\qquad\text{for all }1\le i\le k? \] Here “consecutive intervals” means there exist integers $a_1\le b_1 < a_2\le b_2 < \cdots < a_k\le b_k$ with $a_{i+1}=b_i+1$ and $I_i=\{a_i,a_i+1,\dots,b_i\}$.QUICK LITERATURE/CONTEXT CHECK.
I did not use external sources. I only use the examples stated in the problem text and perform a local computation search for small $k$.ATTACK PLAN.
Proof-track: reduce the condition to factorial congruences in $\mathbb{F}_p$ and try to force repeated factorial values; relate to Wilson's theorem and possible cycle structure of $t!\bmod p$. Disproof-track: search for an obstruction (e.g. show that for each fixed $p$ the maximum $k$ is bounded). Best path here: obtain equivalent formulations (lemmas) and do computational exploration; no general proof is found.WORK.
Lemma 1 (localization away from multiples of $p$). If $(p;I_1,\dots,I_k)$ is a solution, then translating all intervals by a multiple of $p$ (replacing every $n$ by $n+tp$ for a fixed integer $t$) yields another solution. Moreover, in any solution, none of the intervals may contain a multiple of $p$.Proof. For any integer $t$, $n+tp\equiv n\pmod p$, so $\prod_{n\in I_i}(n+tp)\equiv \prod_{n\in I_i}n\equiv 1\pmod p$. Consecutiveness is preserved under translation. If some interval contained a multiple of $p$, then its product would be $0\pmod p$, contradicting the requirement that it be $1\pmod p$. $\square$
Lemma 2 (factorial-chain formulation). Assume $I_1,\dots,I_k$ lie inside a block of consecutive integers with no multiples of $p$. After translation (Lemma 1), we may assume $I_1\cup\cdots\cup I_k \subseteq \{1,2,\dots,p-1\}$. Write $I_i=[a_i,b_i]$ with $1\le a_i\le b_i\le p-1$ and $a_{i+1}=b_i+1$. Define $a_0:=a_1-1$ and $a_i:=b_i$ for $1\le i\le k$. Then the condition $\prod_{n\in I_i} n \equiv 1\pmod p$ for all $i$ is equivalent to \[ a_{i}! \equiv a_{i-1}! \pmod p\qquad\text{for all }1\le i\le k, \] where $0!=1$.
Proof. For $1\le a\le b\le p-1$, all numbers $1,2,\dots,p-1$ are invertible modulo $p$, so \[ \prod_{n=a}^{b} n \equiv \frac{b!}{(a-1)!}\pmod p. \] Thus $\prod_{n=a}^{b}n\equiv 1$ iff $b!\equiv (a-1)!$. Applying this to $I_i=[a_i,b_i]$ gives $b_i!\equiv (a_i-1)!$. Since $a_i-1=b_{i-1}$, this is exactly $a_i!\equiv a_{i-1}!$ in the notation above. $\square$
FAST REALITY CHECK (computation). Using Lemma 2, I searched primes $p$ for increasing chains $a_0<a_1<\cdots<a_k\le p-1$ with $a_i!\equiv a_{i-1}!\pmod p$. Within the searched range, the smallest prime $p$ found for each $k\in\{2,\dots,8\}$ (together with one solution as consecutive intervals in $[1,p-1]$) was:
k=2: p=5, intervals: [1,1], [2,3]
k=3: p=17, intervals: [1,1], [2,5], [6,11]
k=4: p=17, intervals: [1,1], [2,5], [6,11], [12,15]
k=5: p=23, intervals: [1,1], [2,4], [5,8], [9,11], [12,21]
k=6: p=71, intervals: [8,9], [10,19], [20,51], [52,61], [62,63], [64,70]
k=7: p=599, intervals: [29,50], [51,122], [123,183], [184,250], [251,289],
[290,500], [501,539]
k=8: p=599, same first 7 intervals plus [540,555]
(Each list is consecutive and lies in $[1,p-1]$, hence can be translated to an integer solution by Lemma 1.)