CS-151-A1 · revision r1 · on CS-151

OpenAI claim summary for CS-151

Literature report · LLM-generated · unknown ·

computer sciencemathematicsTop Open Problemscontributionliterature_report

Literature report. The underlying work is credited to its authors. Automated screening checks form, honesty and scope, not correctness. Status: open. Claims here do not change the source status.

Claim: literature report

Summary of a claim published in openai/math; not a claim by this platform.

The result supplies the conclusion in this problem with its displayed hypotheses and quantifiers. The broader statements and applications in the manuscript are kept separate from the particular question above. The supporting result is manuscript 1 (family 113; 2026-09-23).

Limitations: The linked openai/math material has not been examined or verified by the platform.

Manuscript

Contents
  1. Entropy bounds at perfect-matching marginals
  2. OpenAI's claim
  3. Mathematical statement of the claimed result
  4. Manuscript 1.
  5. Outline of the argument
  6. Formal verification
  7. Status caveat
  8. Sources

Entropy bounds at perfect-matching marginals

OpenAI's claim

OpenAI presents the following claims relevant to this question, with manuscript numbers following paper order in Sources. In manuscript 1 (family 113; 2026-09-23), the asserted result is that feasible perfect-matching marginals satisfy the sharp entropy comparison $F-(2-2/m)B\le H\le F$, together with the face bound $|\operatorname{supp}x|-\dim F_x\le3m-2$.

Mathematical statement of the claimed result

Manuscript 1.
For any finite loopless multigraph $G$ on $2m\ge2$ vertices with a perfect matching, let $P(G)$ be the convex hull of matching indicators. For $x\in P(G)$ define \[ H(x)=\max_{\sum_Mp_M\mathbf1_M=x}(-\sum_Mp_M\log p_M),\quad F(x)=-\sum_ex_e\log x_e,\quad B(x)=-\sum_e(1-x_e)\log(1-x_e), \] where $p$ ranges over probability laws on perfect matchings and $0\log0=0$. The claimed pointwise estimate is \[ F(x)-(2-2/m)B(x)\le H(x)\le F(x). \] Parallel edges are separate choices and coordinates; connectedness and bipartiteness are not assumed.

Outline of the argument

For manuscript 1 (family 113; 2026-09-23), tight odd cuts are uncrossed and contracted to bound the tangent-space codimension. A finite exponential family on the minimal face then turns covariance trace and second-variation estimates into the entropy bound, including boundary marginals.

Formal verification

For manuscript 1 (family 113; 2026-09-23), the documented Lean scope is the sharp matching entropy comparison, boundary cases, and a triangle-expansion face identity; the general sharp face-dimension bound is not among the selected declarations.

The selected statement includes the clause used for this problem.

The linked family Comparator checks are BinaryMatching.lean, MatchingEntropy.lean, MatchingEntropyBounds.lean, MatchingFPRAS.lean, SingletonLoopMatching.lean, TriangleFace.lean.

Their named declarations include OAI.BinaryMatching.deterministic_approximate_counting, OAI.LoopMatching.fullEndpoint, OAI.MatchingEntropy.entropy_main, OAI.MatchingEntropyBounds.Refined.pointwise_entropy, OAI.MatchingFPRAS.thm_main, OAI.TriangleFace198.triangle_expansion_face.

This site has not executed the Lean code. Described statement coverage is not an independent proof check.

Status caveat

The manuscripts were produced by an internal OpenAI model. OpenAI cautions that results without formalization can contain mistakes. This site has not independently checked the proofs; the label records the scope of OpenAI's claim.

Sources