Visibility Graphs of Points, Segments and Polygons — Problem 43
Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
The supplied source asks for an asymptotically tight bound on the number of bits used by an optimal covering set of a visibility graph, together with a polynomial-time construction attaining that bound. The excerpt does not define a covering set, specify the class of visibility graphs, or specify how covering sets are encoded. These omissions prevent a complete mathematical formulation.The optimization target can be described conditionally as follows. Once the intended instance class and representations have been specified, let $I$ denote an instance representing a visibility graph, let $\mathcal{C}(I)$ denote its admissible covering sets, and let $\ell_I(C)\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}$ denote the number of bits in the prescribed representation of $C\in\mathcal{C}(I)$. For instances with $\mathcal{C}(I)\neq\varnothing$, define \[ b(I)=\min_{C\in\mathcal{C}(I)}\ell_I(C). \] The requested tasks are to determine a tight asymptotic bound for this optimum, with respect to the intended size parameter, and to construct an admissible covering set attaining that bound in polynomial time. This is a formulation schema: the supplied excerpt does not determine $\mathcal{C}(I)$, $\ell_I$, the size parameter, or the computational input representation. It also does not specify whether the asymptotic bound concerns each instance or the worst case over instances of a given size. No particular choices for these missing specifications are asserted here.
Short English statement
Problem 43 asks how many bits an optimal covering set of a visibility graph requires, up to asymptotic order, and asks for a polynomial-time construction matching that bound. The supplied excerpt leaves the covering-set definition, graph class, encoding, size parameter, and computational model unspecified; these require clarification before the problem has a precise complete statement.Sources
- Supplied local UnsolvedMath registry record: permanent ID $800569$, source problem code
catalogue entry, title Visibility Graphs of Points, Segments and Polygons --- Problem 43. Upstream revision:d371ee917ac9647fbb06cd6fc529deec6f3dda82. - Ghosh and Goswami, Unsolved Problems in Visibility Graphs of Points, Segments and Polygons (2010), Problem 43. Supplied source link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5187. The record attributes the problem to Ghosh and Goswami and gives the proposed year as 2010.
- The supplied provenance records access on 2026-10-16 and extraction by
arxiv_latex. These are supplied provenance details; no independent source visit or verification is asserted. The registry labels the problemopen; that label is supplied curation, not an independently verified assessment of its mathematical status.
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.