Math-1711 · mathematics · Graph theory

Math-1711

Uniform expansion bounds for graph nets

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

For an infinite connected graph $G$, let $h(G)=\inf_{0<|A|<\infty}|\partial_G A|/|A|$, where $\partial_G A$ is the external vertex boundary. A $k$-net is a maximal set $N\subseteq V(G)$ whose distinct points have graph distance at least $k$. Its graph $G_k$ joins distinct points of $N$ whenever their original distance is at most $2k$.

For real $h>0$, integer $d\ge2$, and integer $k\ge1$, define the optimal uniform lower bound \[ F(h,d,k)=\inf\{h(G_k):h(G)>h,\ \sup_v\deg_G(v)<d\}, \] where the infimum ranges over all infinite connected graphs satisfying the conditions and all their $k$-nets. The fixed-$k$ comparison gives positive lower bounds. Is \[ \inf_{k\ge1}F(1,10,k)>0? \] Equivalently, is there one $\varepsilon>0$ such that every net at every scale of every graph with $h(G)>1$ and maximum degree at most nine has Cheeger constant at least $\varepsilon$?

The source also asks for the behavior on a fixed regular tree $T_d$, $d\ge3$. With $F_d(k)=\inf_N h((T_d)_k)$ over its $k$-nets, is $\inf_kF_d(k)>0$, and does $F_d(k)\to\infty$ as $k\to\infty$? The infimum over nets is essential because maximal separated sets need not be unique or symmetric. These are uniform expansion questions; the degrees of the net graphs themselves may grow with $k$.

Short English statement

Do graph nets retain uniformly positive expansion at all scales, and does their expansion grow without bound on regular trees?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.