Transversal Foliations and Global Sections for Reeb Flows
Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
Let $M$ be a smooth closed $3$-manifold, where closed means compact without boundary, and let $\alpha$ be a contact form, so that $\alpha\wedge{\,\mathrm{d}}\alpha$ is nowhere zero. Its Reeb vector field $R_\alpha$ is characterized by \[ \alpha(R_\alpha)=1,\qquad {\,\mathrm{d}}\alpha(R_\alpha,\cdot)=0. \] Write $\varphi^t$ for its flow and $h_{\mathrm{top}}(\varphi^1)$ for the topological entropy of its time-one map. An invariant torus means a smoothly embedded torus $T\subset M$ satisfying $\varphi^t(T)=T$ for every $t\in{\mathbb{R}}$.Under the usual compact-surface convention, a global surface of section for a nonsingular flow on a $3$-manifold $N$ is a compact embedded surface $S\subset N$, possibly with boundary, whose boundary consists of periodic trajectories, whose interior is transverse to the flow, and such that every trajectory in $N\setminus\partial S$ meets $\operatorname{int}S$ in both positive and negative time. The supplied record does not specify whether this convention, or a convention allowing noncompact surfaces or boundary on a compactification, is intended after invariant tori are removed.
Source question, with unresolved terminology. For every Reeb flow on a closed $3$-manifold that admits a transverse foliation and satisfies \[ h_{\mathrm{top}}(\varphi^1)=0, \] must there exist finitely many invariant tori $T_1,\ldots,T_k$ such that the restricted flow on \[ M\setminus\bigcup_{i=1}^{k}T_i \] admits a global surface of section? Here the interpretation of "transverse foliation" and the appropriate meaning of a global surface of section on this complement remain unspecified by the record. Consequently, this is a qualified formulation of the supplied question, not a fully determined assertion under the compact-surface convention above. The source also asks more broadly what additional dynamical structure follows from admitting a transversal foliation.
No non-degeneracy hypothesis occurs in the supplied question. The supplied literature assessment mentions results under non-degeneracy and zero-entropy assumptions; those qualifications must not be silently added to the question or treated as a complete statement of the cited results.
Short English statement
Does every zero-topological-entropy Reeb flow on a closed $3$-manifold admitting a transverse foliation have a global surface of section after finitely many invariant tori are removed? The intended foliation and the meaning of a global section on the resulting complement require clarification. The supplied record labels the problem partially solved; that assessment is not independently verified here.Sources
- Supplied local UnsolvedMath problem registry, permanent ID $30004184$, source problem code
catalogue entry, title: Transversal Foliations and Global Sections for Reeb Flows. The record lists proposed year 2019 and identifies no individual proposer. - Supplied report citation: Dynamische Systeme (2020), Oberwolfach Reports, pp. 1855--1917, DOI 10.4171/owr/2019/31. Original OWR report: https://doi.org/10.4171/owr/2019/31.
- Supplied literature reference: Hryniewicz--Salomao--Wysocki, "global sections": https://doi.org/10.4171/JEMS/1220. The record supplies no complete article title or theorem statement.
- Literature assessment checked at
2026-08-22: supplied dated curation, not independently verified. It labels the problem partially solved and states that transversal-foliation methods yield symbolic dynamics and a global surface of section under non-degeneracy and zero-entropy assumptions, while the broad question about all resulting Reeb flows remains unsettled. The background explicitly requests independent verification of time-sensitive status and cited claims. - The registry labels the statement
corrected_verified; its accompanying explanation describes repairs to notation, typography, and sentence structure while preserving mathematical content. This supplied label is not independent mathematical verification of the formulation or its literature status.
Statement licence: CC-BY-SA-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.