The Lyapin's Notebook — Problem 53
Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
Under the standard convention, an involuted semigroup is a nonempty algebra $(S,\cdot,{}^{*})$ satisfying, for all $x,y,z\in S$, \[ (xy)z=x(yz),\qquad (xy)^{*}=y^{*}x^{*},\qquad (x^{*})^{*}=x. \] A variety of such algebras is a class specified by identities in this signature. These conventions provide standard terminology; the supplied excerpt does not explicitly specify its signature or involution axioms.Requested classification. Describe the varieties of involuted semigroups for which the quasivarieties of models representable in those varieties are finitely axiomatizable.
For clarity, in a fixed algebraic signature $L$, a quasi-identity is a sentence of the form \[ \forall x_1\cdots\forall x_n\left(\bigwedge_{i=1}^{m}s_i=t_i\;\Longrightarrow\;s=t\right), \] where the displayed expressions are $L$-terms. Under the usual algebraic interpretation, finite axiomatizability of a quasivariety $\mathcal Q$ means that there is a finite set $\Sigma$ of quasi-identities such that, for every nonempty $L$-algebra $A$, \[ A\in\mathcal Q\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad A\models\Sigma. \] The source does not define the models being represented, their signature, or the representation relation connecting them to a variety of involuted semigroups. Consequently, the preceding definition explains the usual algebraic meaning of finite axiomatizability but does not identify the intended quasivarieties. It also remains unspecified whether axiomatization is absolute or relative to an ambient class. These missing specifications prevent a fully determined classification statement.
The supplied source adds that a corresponding description for "classical varieties" was obtained in reference [Gorn1]. Neither that term nor the bibliographic identity and scope of [Gorn1] is supplied.
Short English statement
The problem asks which varieties of involuted semigroups give rise to finitely axiomatizable quasivarieties of representable models. The supplied excerpt leaves the models and their representations undefined, so the exact classification target requires clarification from the source. It attributes the problem to O. M. Gornostaev and S. I. Kublanovsky and reports an earlier result for "classical varieties" in [Gorn1].Sources
- Supplied local UnsolvedMath registry record: permanent ID $800051$, source problem code
catalogue entry, title The Lyapin's Notebook --- Problem 53. The registry labels the problem open; this is a supplied status, not an independently verified mathematical assessment. - Bershadsky, Kublanovsky, and Mashevitzky, The Lyapin's Notebook: Unsolved Problems in Semigroup Theory (2026), Problem 53. Supplied source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04763. The source record reports access on 2026-10-16 and extraction by
arxiv_latex; these are supplied provenance details, not a claim of independent access or verification. - The problem statement attributes the question to O. M. Gornostaev and S. I. Kublanovsky. The registry separately lists Bershadsky, Kublanovsky, and Mashevitzky in its proposer field, with year 2026; that metadata does not establish the original proposal date.
- Reference [Gorn1], cited in the supplied statement for a description concerning "classical varieties." No author expansion, title, publication details, or URL for this reference is supplied.
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.