Math-2091 · mathematics · Combinatorics

Math-2091

Suppose that G is a tree

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

For a finite simple graph $G$, its line graph $L(G)$ has vertex set $E(G)$, with two distinct vertices adjacent precisely when the corresponding edges of $G$ share an endpoint. Define iterates by $L^0(G)=G$ and $L^{j+1}(G)=L(L^j(G))$ for integers $j\ge0$. An empty line graph is allowed, so iteration continues after all vertices have disappeared.

For a finite tree $T$, write \[ a_j(T)=|V(L^j(T))|\qquad(j\ge0). \] Graham's reconstruction question asks whether this complete sequence determines $T$ up to graph isomorphism. In quantified form, must two finite trees $T,T'$ satisfying \[ a_j(T)=a_j(T')\quad\text{for all integers }j\ge0 \] be isomorphic?

Only the orders of the iterated line graphs are supplied, not the iterated graphs themselves, their degree sequences, or embeddings. The first entries give the numbers of vertices and edges of the tree, but the problem uses the entire infinite sequence. Agreement through an arbitrary fixed finite number of iterates is not itself a counterexample. Conversely, nonisomorphic trees with all these orders equal would disprove reconstruction even if their line graphs differ as graphs at early stages.

Short English statement

Does the sequence of vertex counts of all iterated line graphs determine a finite tree up to isomorphism?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.