Math-2012 · mathematics · Graph theory

Math-2012

Some Questions — Question 16

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let $G$ be a finite simple $d$-regular graph on $N$ vertices, where $d\geq2$ is fixed. Its adjacency matrix $A_G$ is real symmetric, with eigenvalues $\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_N$ counted with algebraic multiplicity. Define its empirical spectral distribution by \[ \mu_G=\frac1N\sum_{i=1}^N\delta_{\lambda_i}. \] Determine which probability measures can occur in this way, and find effective natural restrictions on these distributions. A related limiting formulation asks which measures are weak limits of such $\mu_G$ as $N$ tends to infinity; weak convergence means convergence of integrals against every continuous function on $[-d,d]$.

Every exact distribution is a finitely supported measure with rational atom weights, is supported in $[-d,d]$, and satisfies \[ \int t\,d\mu_G(t)=0,\qquad \int t^2\,d\mu_G(t)=d. \] More generally, $N\int t^k\,d\mu_G(t)=\operatorname{tr}(A_G^k)$ counts closed walks of length $k$. These elementary constraints illustrate the kind of restrictions sought; they are not asserted to characterize all possible distributions.

Connectedness is not required in the source, so disjoint unions are permitted. Exact realizability and weak-limit realizability should be distinguished: limits need not be atomic, and the single eigenvalue $d$ in a connected graph can have vanishing normalized mass. A characterization must account for regular-graph structure beyond the usual conditions on arbitrary symmetric matrices.

Short English statement

What intrinsic restrictions characterize eigenvalue distributions of finite regular graphs and their limits?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.