Math-3729 · mathematics · Analysis

Math-3729

Research Problems in Function Theory — Problem 7.51

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Shared notation.
$\mathbb N=\{1,2,\ldots\}$, and $\mathbb Z,\mathbb Q,\mathbb R,\mathbb C$ denote the integers, rationals, reals and complex numbers. Any other conventions are specified locally.

Let $D\subset\mathbb C^n$, $n>1$, be a bounded domain with $C^\infty$ strictly pseudoconvex boundary. Strict pseudoconvexity means a smooth defining function has positive Levi form on the complex tangent directions of the boundary. Let $A^\infty(D)$ be the holomorphic functions on $D$ whose complex derivatives of every order extend continuously to $\overline D$. For a multi-index $\alpha\in\mathbb Z_{\ge0}^n$ write $\partial^\alpha f$ for the corresponding derivative. In the question's convention, a closed $E\subset\partial D$ is a flat non-uniqueness set if some $f\in A^\infty(D)$, $f\not\equiv0$, has zero set exactly $E$ on $\overline D$ and $\partial^\alpha f=0$ on $E$ for every $\alpha$.

Statement recorded in the supplied source.
If $E$ is such a flat non-uniqueness set, is every closed subset $F\subset E$ also such a set? In particular, does each $F$ admit a nonzero function in $A^\infty(D)$ with zero set exactly $F$ and all derivatives vanishing on $F$? [S2] The source uses its explicit exact-zero-set and all-derivatives convention and notes the affirmative result for the one-dimensional unit disc. [S2]

Short English statement

Is the class of exact flat zero sets of smooth holomorphic functions on a strictly pseudoconvex domain closed under taking closed subsets?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.