Math-3520 · mathematics · Analysis

Math-3520

Research Problems in Function Theory — Problem 2.79

Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Shared notation.
$\mathbb N=\{1,2,\ldots\}$, and $\mathbb Z,\mathbb Q,\mathbb R,\mathbb C$ denote the integers, rationals, reals and complex numbers. Any other conventions are specified locally.

Let $g:\widehat{\mathbb C}\to\widehat{\mathbb C}$ be a rational map of degree at least $2$. Its Julia set $J(g)$ is the complement of the normality set of its iterates. Area means spherical two-dimensional area. A Beltrami differential on $J(g)$ is a measurable coefficient $\mu$ with $\|\mu\|_\infty<1$. It is invariant if, in local complex coordinates, \[\mu(z)=\mu(g(z))\frac{\overline{g'(z)}}{g'(z)}\] for almost every $z\in J(g)$; the finitely many critical points do not affect this condition. The source update reports Buff--Chéritat quadratic counterexamples to part (b), with positive-area Julia sets.

Statement recorded in the supplied source.
Assume $J(g)\ne\widehat{\mathbb C}$. (a) Must every invariant Beltrami differential on $J(g)$ vanish almost everywhere? (b) Must $J(g)$ have area zero? [S2]

Short English statement

For a rational map whose Julia set is not the whole sphere, must every invariant Beltrami differential vanish, and must the Julia set have zero area?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.