Math-2038 · mathematics · Analysis

Math-2038

Research Problems in Function Theory — Problem 2.60

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let $f(z)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_kz^k$ be a nonconstant entire function with $f(z)\ne0$ for all $z\in\mathbb C$. Such a function is necessarily transcendental. For $n\ge1$ let $S_n(z)=\sum_{k=0}^na_kz^k$ denote its Taylor section at the origin. Must it be true that for every $\varepsilon>0$ there are an integer $n\ge1$ and a complex number $z_0$ with \[ S_n(z_0)=0,\qquad |f(z_0)|<\varepsilon? \] Equivalently, the infimum of $|f(z)|$ over the union of the zero sets of all nonconstant Taylor sections should be zero. Constant sections have no zeros because $a_0=f(0)\ne0$ and can simply be ignored. The nonconstant assumption removes the trivial constant counterexample. The function $f$ has no zeros, so the required points only approach small nonzero values of $f$. They cannot remain in a fixed compact set, since $f$ has a positive minimum modulus there. Uniform convergence of sections on compact sets therefore does not settle the problem. The source notes that if the zero-free assumption is dropped and $f$ has a zero, the corresponding assertion follows from Hurwitz's theorem.

Short English statement

Must some zeros of Taylor sections of a nonconstant zero-free entire function occur where the original function is arbitrarily small?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.