Math-5521 · mathematics · Analysis

Math-5521

Research Problems in Function Theory — Problem 2.12a

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

The source imposes the same conditions as its Problem 2.12, but neither that problem nor the definitions of $\rho$ and $\Delta$ are included. The two questions must therefore retain those unresolved inherited hypotheses.

A finite asymptotic value of a function defined near infinity is a number $a\in{\mathbb{C}}$ for which there is a curve $\gamma:[0,\infty)\to{\mathbb{C}}$ with $|\gamma(t)|\to\infty$ and $f(\gamma(t))\to a$; the curve is taken in the function's domain. The first question is whether the inherited conditions together with \[ \rho\Delta<1 \] force $f$ to have no finite asymptotic value. The source attributes to Kövari a result under the stronger condition $\rho\Delta<1/\pi^2$.

The second question uses the minimum and maximum moduli \[ m_0(r,f)=\min_{|z|=r}|f(z)|,\qquad M(r,f)=\max_{|z|=r}|f(z)|, \] where these expressions are defined in the inherited function class, and asks whether \[ \limsup_{r\to\infty} \frac{\log m_0(r,f)}{\log M(r,f)} \geq\cos(\pi\rho\Delta). \] At a radius containing a zero, $\log m_0=-\infty$ in the extended-real sense; a nondegenerate interpretation of the denominator and any other restrictions must follow from the missing hypotheses. The second question does not separately repeat the threshold $\rho\Delta<1$, so whether that restriction is intended for it cannot be silently decided.

No meaning for $\Delta$, ambient function class, order convention for $\rho$, or additional zero/growth assumptions is guessed from the formulas. Recovering Problem 2.12 is essential to completing either precise assertion.

Short English statement

Under the missing hypotheses of Problem 2.12, improve the reported $1/\pi^2$ threshold to one for exclusion of finite asymptotic values, and establish the stated cosine lower bound for the minimum-to-maximum logarithmic growth ratio. The supplied triage says both were open in Hayman's 2018 update and reports no recent resolution located. Its claim that only the $1/\pi^2$ partial result is known is a dated assessment rather than independent verification in this draft.

Sources

  • UnsolvedMath permanent ID 2302512, source code catalogue entry, "Research Problems in Function Theory --- Problem 2.12a." Registry curation and metadata: Ulam AI and UnsolvedMath Contributors, CC BY 4.0; updated 2026-08-06.
  • Hayman, Research Problems in Function Theory (2018 source update), Problem 2.12a, referring to Problem 2.12: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07200. Supplied source-TeX extraction accessed 2026-07-29. The metadata retains the update for status triage and marks status/release and rights review NEEDS_REVIEW.
  • Kövari, as rendered from the supplied source-TeX name, is cited for the threshold result and the related minimum-modulus question. No complete title, date, theorem number or locator is supplied; none is inferred.

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.