Math-5565 · mathematics · Combinatorics

Math-5565

Rank-respecting augmentation of hypergraphs with negamodular constraints

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let $V$ be a finite vertex set and $G_0=(V,\mathcal E_0)$ a hypergraph. For a hypergraph $H=(V,\mathcal E_H)$, define its cut degree and rank by \[ d_H(X)=\#\{e\in\mathcal E_H:e\cap X\ne\varnothing, \ e\cap(V\setminus X)\ne\varnothing\}, \qquad \operatorname{rank}(H)=\max_{e\in\mathcal E_H}|e|, \] counting multiplicities if parallel hyperedges are permitted. The source does not specify that convention or the rank of an edgeless hypergraph.

The input is a crossing negamodular integer-valued function $R:2^V\to{\mathbb{Z}}$ satisfying \[ R(X)\ne1\qquad\text{for every }X\subseteq V. \] With a commonly used supermodular-sign convention, crossing negamodularity means \[ R(A)+R(B)\leq R(A\setminus B)+R(B\setminus A) \] for crossing pairs $A,B$, customarily requiring all four regions $A\cap B$, $A\setminus B$, $B\setminus A$, and $V\setminus(A\cup B)$ nonempty. The precise sign and crossing-pair convention are not defined in the supplied excerpt and must be checked against the source.

Optimization problem. Find an added hypergraph $G=(V,\mathcal E)$ of minimum total size such that \[ d_G(X)\geq R(X)-d_{G_0}(X)\quad\text{for every }X\subseteq V, \qquad \operatorname{rank}(G)\leq\operatorname{rank}(G_0). \] Thus it is the added hypergraph whose size is minimized, and the augmented cut requirements are $d_G(X)+d_{G_0}(X)\geq R(X)$. The source says "total size" without defining whether this means $\sum_{e\in\mathcal E}|e|$, number of hyperedges, or another cost. No one objective is silently selected.

Feasibility is not guaranteed by the displayed hypotheses: in particular the constraints at $\varnothing$ and $V$ require $R(\varnothing),R(V)\leq0$, but no such normalization is supplied. The intended infeasibility convention, representation/oracle for $R$, and algorithmic efficiency target are likewise absent.

The supplied summary says related supermodular/negamodular augmentation problems have polyhedral and matroid-intersection algorithms, mentions A. Frank, T. Király, and others, and reports no published algorithm located for this exact rank-respecting variant. The archived Egres index is explicitly not a current resolution authority.

Short English statement

Add a minimum-size hypergraph meeting the residual cut requirements of a crossing negamodular function, while keeping every added edge within the original rank bound. The special condition $R(X)\ne1$ is retained. The objective, feasibility assumptions, graph conventions, and algorithmic model require clarification.

Sources

  • Local UnsolvedMath registry, permanent ID 3000069, source code catalogue entry, "Rank-respecting augmentation of hypergraphs with negamodular constraints"; supplied status open, classification OPEN-TRIAGE, updated 2026-08-06. No proposer is supplied.
  • Egres Open, List of open problems, indexed page with that title, https://oldlemon.cs.elte.hu/egres/open/List_of_open_problems. Reported HTML extraction and access: 2026-07-29. The record says the index labels the page open but the archived wiki is not a current resolution authority.
  • The summary names A. Frank, T. Király, and others for related work without specific publications. Rights note: NEEDS_REVIEW; public wiki access was verified but no redistribution license was displayed in the archived footer.

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.