Math-1798 · mathematics · Group theory

Math-1798

Questions in Geometric Group Theory — Q 2.13

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

A Coxeter matrix on a finite set $S$ is a symmetric matrix with $m_{ss}=1$ and $m_{st}\in\{2,3,\ldots\}\cup\{\infty\}$ for distinct indices. Its group is \[ W(M)=\langle S\mid s^2=1\ (s\in S),\ (st)^{m_{st}}=1 \ (s\ne t,\ m_{st}<\infty)\rangle. \] The symbol $\infty$ records the absence of a relation for that pair. The finite labeled diagram, or equivalently the matrix, is the input describing a Coxeter presentation.

Classify these groups up to abstract isomorphism. More precisely, give necessary and sufficient conditions on two finite Coxeter matrices $M,N$ for $W(M)\cong W(N)$, in terms of their defining data or intrinsic invariants that can be determined from those data. An effective classification would in particular decide isomorphism from two finite matrices.

The requested isomorphism is not required to send the displayed generators to displayed generators, or even to reflections of the second Coxeter system. A reflection relative to $S$ means a conjugate of an element of $S$. Hence a classification only of marked Coxeter systems, or only of reflection-preserving isomorphisms, is a restricted version. Relabeling an identical diagram certainly produces an isomorphic group, but the question asks for all possible coincidences between presentations. Both finite and infinite Coxeter groups, including reducible diagrams, belong to the class.

Short English statement

Give a complete criterion for when two finite Coxeter presentations define isomorphic abstract groups.

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.