Math-13215 · mathematics · Topology

Math-13215

Problem 7.27 — (J.

Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

For orientation of terminology, a scalar modular form of integral weight $k$ for a subgroup $\Gamma\subset\mathrm{SL}_2({\mathbb{Z}})$, in the simplest trivial-multiplier convention, is a holomorphic function on $\mathbb H=\{\tau\in{\mathbb{C}}:\operatorname{Im}\tau>0\}$ satisfying \[ f\!\left(\frac{a\tau+b}{c\tau+d}\right) =(c\tau+d)^k f(\tau) \quad\left(\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}\in\Gamma\right), \] with the prescribed cusp holomorphy conditions. Other weights, multipliers and vector-valued forms require their own conventions; the source selects none here.

J. Roberts's Problem 7.27 asks to explain the appearance of modular forms in the Witten invariants. Write $\tau_r^G(M)$ for a Witten-type quantum invariant only as descriptive notation: the record does not specify the group $G$, level convention $r$, normalization, manifold class, or analytic series to which a modular transformation law is attached. It gives no particular modular form, weight, group, or identity to prove.

The requested explanation therefore remains a comparison program: identify the relevant objects and the mechanism relating them in the intended examples. It must not be replaced by the assertion that every quantum invariant is itself a modular form. The supplied partial-progress summary points to modularity phenomena for quantum invariants at roots of unity and work of Zagier, Lawrence and others, but supplies neither exact examples nor complete primary references.

Short English statement

Explain why modular forms occur in the study of Witten invariants. The source does not select the invariants, manifolds, modular objects, or transformation formulas. Its supplied assessment reports related work and partial progress rather than a precise resolved theorem.

Sources

  • Local UnsolvedMath registry, permanent ID $10400142$, exact source code catalogue entry, Problem 7.27, attributed to J. Roberts. The supplied title is truncated after "(J."
  • Ohtsuki, Problems on invariants of knots and 3-manifolds (2002), Problem 7.27, PDF page 118: https://msp.org/gtm/2002/04/gtm-2002-04-024s.pdf. Bold printed headings distinguish 231 numbered items from surrounding references.
  • Extraction pdf-font-structure, accessed 2026-07-29. Source evidence NEEDS_REVIEW presents an open problem and requires a current primary-literature audit. Registry status partially_solved and classification PARTIAL-PROGRESS mention roots-of-unity modularity and work of Zagier and Lawrence, without complete citations or a precise resolved scope.
  • Dataset attribution: Ulam AI / UnsolvedMath Contributors, CC BY 4.0. Source rights NEEDS_REVIEW: publicly accessible author/publisher copy, redistribution terms requiring review.

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.