CS-109 · computer science · mathematics · Computational algebra and number theory

CS-109 · Math-2281

Prime-factor advice in power-residue quotients

Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems unknownunknown Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Shared notation.
$\mathbb N$, $\mathbb Z$, $\mathbb Q$, $\mathbb R$, and $\mathbb C$ denote the natural numbers, integers, rationals, reals, and complex numbers, respectively. All additional parameters and hypotheses are specified in the question.
Statement recorded in the supplied source.
For a given prime $p$, how much auxiliary data suffices to reduce the solution of higher-degree equations modulo $p$ to an efficient computation, in analogy with a single quadratic nonresidue for quadratic equations? Does a deterministic subexponential-time algorithm find a quadratic nonresidue modulo $p$ without an unproved hypothesis?

Formulation references: [S1], [S2].

Short English statement

For a given prime $p$, how much auxiliary data suffices to reduce the solution of higher-degree equations modulo $p$ to an efficient computation, in analogy with a single quadratic nonresidue for quadratic equations? Does a deterministic subexponential-time algorithm find a quadratic nonresidue modulo $p$ without an unproved hypothesis?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

CS-109-A1 · Literature report · LLM-generated · unknown ·

OpenAI claim summary for CS-109

The factorization theorem supplies a quadratic nonresidue without the proposed auxiliary information. It does not characterize the higher-degree power-residue advice reduction in the other part of this question.

Prime-factor advice in power-residue quotients

OpenAI's claim

OpenAI presents the following claims relevant to this question, with manuscript numbers following paper order in Sources. In manuscript 1 (family 142; 2026-10-04), the asserted result is that dense polynomials over binary-specified prime fields have uniform deterministic complete factorization in bit time polynomial in degree and $\log p$, using the cited Hecke zero-free input.

Mathematical statement of the claimed result

Manuscript 1.
For any binary-encoded prime $p$ and nonzero densely encoded $f\in\mathbb F_p[x]$ of degree $n$, a uniform deterministic algorithm is claimed to output \[ f=c\prod_i g_i^{e_i} \] with $c$ the leading coefficient, distinct monic irreducible $g_i$ and positive integer multiplicities, in $O(((n+1)\lceil\log_2p\rceil)^{10^{12}})$ bit operations. Constants have an empty factor list. The computation is unconditional and deterministic; it receives neither an integer-factorization service nor a primitive-root oracle.

The separate algebraic reduction sets $L=\lceil\log_2p\rceil$, $B=20+(n+1)(L+1)$. If $p>B^{200000}$ and $n\ge2$, supply for every prime $q\le n$ a prime $\ell_q\notin\{2,3,p,q\}$ with \[ \ell_q\equiv1\pmod{12q},\qquad p^{(\ell_q-1)/q}\not\equiv1\pmod{\ell_q}. \] That reduction has bit cost $O((B+E)^C)$ for absolute $C$, where $E=\max(2,\max_q\ell_q)$, and $E=2$ when no such primes are required. This bound depends on the numerical size of the auxiliary primes; the full theorem additionally constructs sufficiently small primes.

Outline of the argument

For manuscript 1 (family 142; 2026-10-04), primary generators and norm equations reduce splitting to an odd-degree separator. Lifted ramification classes are filtered to keep extension degrees polynomial, and divisors at infinity distinguish roots; the analytic input bounds the auxiliary primes required by the finite algebraic algorithm.

Formal verification

No Lean formalization is listed at this snapshot for manuscript 1 (family 142; 2026-10-04).

This site has not executed the Lean code. Described statement coverage is not an independent proof check.

Status caveat

The manuscripts were produced by an internal OpenAI model. OpenAI cautions that results without formalization can contain mistakes. This site has not independently checked the proofs; the label records the scope of OpenAI's claim.

Sources

Go to contribution →