Math-2685 · mathematics · Dynamical systems

Math-2685

Pointwise triple ergodic averages with distinct integer slopes under mixing

Status OpenLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems unknownunknown Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Statement recorded in the supplied source.
For every invertible mixing probability-preserving transformation T, every three pairwise distinct nonzero integers a,b,c, and bounded measurable f,g,h, do $(1/N)sum_{n=1}^N$ $f(T^{an}x)g(T^{bn}x)h(T^{cn}x)$ converge almost everywhere to (integral f)(integral g)(integral h), including mixed-sign slopes?

Short English statement

For every invertible mixing probability-preserving transformation T, every three pairwise distinct nonzero integers a,b,c, and bounded measurable f,g,h, do $(1/N)sum_{n=1}^N$ $f(T^{an}x)g(T^{bn}x)h(T^{cn}x)$ converge almost everywhere to (integral f)(integral g)(integral h), including mixed-sign slopes?

Sources

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

Math-2685-A1 · Literature report · LLM-generated · unknown ·

OpenAI claim summary for Math-2685

Manuscript 1 (family 154, 2026-10-04): The problem selects the mathematical statement summarized here, including its stated hypotheses and parameter range. The cited theorem gives a claimed proof of that assertion in full.

Pointwise triple ergodic averages with distinct integer slopes under mixing

OpenAI's claim

Triple averages with any three distinct nonzero integer slopes, including negative ones, are claimed to converge almost everywhere to the product of integrals for mixing transformations. The cited manuscript argues for that result; its relation to this problem is specified below.

Mathematical statement of the claimed result

Mathematical claim 1.
For an invertible bimeasurable probability-preserving mixing $T$, any pairwise distinct nonzero integers $\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3$ and fixed bounded measurable complex functions $f_j$, OpenAI claims \[ \frac1N\sum_{k=1}^N\prod_{j=1}^3 f_j(T^{\lambda_j k}x) \longrightarrow\prod_{j=1}^3\int_X f_j\,d\mu \quad\mu\text{-almost everywhere}. \] Mixing means the two-set correlation condition as $|m|\to\infty$. Negative slopes are allowed, convergence is through all positive $N$, and the excluded null set is allowed to vary when the slopes or functions change.

Outline of the argument

Manuscript 1 (family 154, 2026-10-04): The local progression estimates are extended using an integer left inverse of the complete primitive configuration. Vandermonde cancellation and a height base divisible by every slope difference preserve the Fourier and divisibility bounds through discretization, giving the slope-dependent oscillation estimate needed for convergence.

Formal verification

Family 154 has no Lean scope page in this snapshot; no formalization of these manuscript results is listed.

This site has not executed the Lean files or checked their dependencies. These descriptions report the scope of the linked declarations, rather than a new verification of the proofs.

Status caveat

OpenAI attributes these results to an internal model. Its release notice cautions that results lacking full formalization can contain mistakes. This site has not independently assessed the proofs; a solved label records the scope of the reported claim.

Sources

Go to contribution →