Open Problems in Mathematical Logic — Problem 46
Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
For sets $A,B\subseteq{\mathbb{N}}$, write $A\leq_T B$ if $A$ is computable with oracle $B$, and write $A\equiv_T B$ if both $A\leq_T B$ and $B\leq_T A$. The Turing degree of $A$ is its equivalence class $\deg_T(A)$. A set is computably enumerable (c.e.) if some algorithm enumerates exactly its elements. Let \[ \mathcal D_{\mathrm{ce}}=\{\deg_T(A):A\subseteq{\mathbb{N}}\text{ is c.e.}\}. \] The supplied question is: "Is every/any c.e. degree the degree of topological categoricity?"The source record does not define "degree of topological categoricity," specify the class of topological structures under consideration, or specify their effective presentations and the computational requirements on homeomorphisms. Consequently, a fully specified mathematical assertion cannot be recovered from this record alone.
To display the quantifier structure of the universal reading, let $\mathcal C$ stand for the intended class of structures and let $T(X,\mathbf d)$ stand for the intended assertion that $\mathbf d$ is a degree of topological categoricity of $X$. The question would then have the schema \[ \forall\mathbf d\in\mathcal D_{\mathrm{ce}}\;\exists X\in\mathcal C\;T(X,\mathbf d). \] Here $\mathcal C$ and $T$ are unresolved placeholders, not definitions of a mathematical notion. The wording "every/any" also leaves the intended quantifier insufficiently explicit: if it asks whether there is any such c.e. degree, the corresponding schema is instead \[ \exists\mathbf d\in\mathcal D_{\mathrm{ce}}\;\exists X\in\mathcal C\;T(X,\mathbf d). \] These readings are distinct and require source clarification.
Short English statement
The question asks whether c.e. Turing degrees can occur as degrees of topological categoricity. The supplied wording does not define topological categoricity or its effective setting, and "every/any" leaves the universal versus existential reading unresolved. A precise statement requires these specifications.Sources
- Local UnsolvedMath registry, permanent ID $801034$, source problem code
catalogue entry, title Open Problems in Mathematical Logic --- Problem 46. The supplied registry attributes the problem to Barmpalias, Gao et al., with proposed year 2026, and labels itopen; this is supplied status metadata, not an independently verified mathematical assessment. - Barmpalias, Gao et al., Open Problems in Mathematical Logic (2026), Problem 46. Supplied source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26628. The provenance records access on 2026-10-16 and extraction method
arxiv_latex. These are supplied provenance details; the source has not been independently consulted or verified for this draft.
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.