Math-13670 · mathematics · Logic

Math-13670

Open Problems in Mathematical Logic — Problem 33

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Write \[ T_R=\text{2-RAN},\qquad T_C=\operatorname{CARD}(\Sigma_2),\qquad T_W=\operatorname{WPHP}(\Sigma_2),\qquad T_G=\operatorname{GPHP}(\Sigma_2). \] These are labels for the theories or principles named in the supplied record; their axioms are not supplied. In particular, the record does not define the relevant class $\Sigma_2$, the underlying first-order language, or the background theory.

The source describes $T_R$ as a first-order theory and states that it is "between" $T_C$ and $T_W$. It then asks for the relationship between $T_G$ and $T_R$. The supplied assertion about being between two principles is retained as source context; the record does not specify its implication directions or the comparison relation.

Problem, subject to unresolved definitions. Determine the relative strength of $\operatorname{GPHP}(\Sigma_2)$ and $\text{2-RAN}$ in the setting intended by the source.

If the intended comparison is deductive strength over a common background theory $B$, this would ask which of \[ B+T_R\vdash T_G, \qquad B+T_G\vdash T_R \] hold, where $B+T$ means adjoining the axioms of $T$ to $B$, and derivability of a theory or scheme means derivability of every axiom or instance. This is a conditional interpretation only: neither $B$, the axiom sets, nor deductive strength as the intended comparison is specified in the supplied record. A fully determined formal statement therefore requires additional source definitions.

Short English statement

The source asks how $\operatorname{GPHP}(\Sigma_2)$ compares in strength with the first-order theory $\text{2-RAN}$, against the supplied background assertion that $\text{2-RAN}$ lies between $\operatorname{CARD}(\Sigma_2)$ and $\operatorname{WPHP}(\Sigma_2)$. The definitions, background theory, and exact comparison relation are missing, so the displayed implication questions are explicitly conditional.

Sources

  • Local UnsolvedMath registry: permanent ID $801021$, source problem code catalogue entry, title Open Problems in Mathematical Logic --- Problem 33; collection: AMR Open Problem Lists. The registry attributes the record to Barmpalias, Gao et al., with proposed year 2026, and labels it open. These are supplied registry attributions and status labels, not independently verified mathematical conclusions.
  • Supplied source reference: Barmpalias, Gao et al., Open Problems in Mathematical Logic (2026), Problem 33, https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26628. The supplied provenance records access on 2026-10-16 and extraction by arxiv_latex. This access date and provenance are supplied metadata; the reference has not been independently visited or verified for this draft.

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.