Math-3845 · mathematics · Dynamical systems

Math-3845

Multiple ergodic averages — Problem 17

Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Shared notation.
$\mathbb N=\{1,2,\ldots\}$, and $\mathbb Z,\mathbb Q,\mathbb R,\mathbb C$ denote the integers, rationals, reals and complex numbers. Any other conventions are specified locally.

A system is a probability space $(X,\mathcal X,\mu)$ with invertible measure-preserving transformations; multiple transformations are assumed to commute. Write $T^j f=f\circ T^j$, and $T^j A$ for the image of a measurable set under $T^j$. A system with one transformation is ergodic if every invariant measurable set has measure zero or one. The space $L^\infty(\mu)$ consists of essentially bounded complex measurable functions. Fix $\ell\ge1$ and $p_1,\ldots,p_\ell\in\mathbb Z[t]$ with $p_j(0)=0$. Rational independence means that no nonzero rational linear combination of the $p_j$ is the zero polynomial; since the constant terms vanish, this is equivalent to saying every nontrivial such combination is nonconstant.

Statement recorded in the supplied source.
For every commuting system, every $A\in\mathcal X$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, is there $n\in\mathbb N$ such that \[\mu\left(A\cap T_1^{p_1(n)}A\cap\cdots\cap T_\ell^{p_\ell(n)}A\right)\ge\mu(A)^{\ell+1}-\varepsilon?\] No ergodicity or distinct-degree hypothesis is imposed. [S2]

Short English statement

Do rationally independent zero-constant polynomials force the optimal-power recurrence lower bound in every commuting system?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.