Minimal-Coefficient Polynomial Selection for the Number Field Sieve
Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
Given a modulus $N$ and prescribed degrees $d_f,d_g$, construct irreducible coprime polynomials \[ f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{d_f}a_ix^i,\qquad g(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{d_g}b_jx^j\quad\text{in }{\mathbb{Z}}[x], \qquad a_{d_f}b_{d_g}\ne0, \] with a common root modulo $N$ and coefficients of minimal possible absolute size. In the usual nontrivial setting, $N$ is an integer greater than one and the degrees are positive integers; the source does not explicitly specify their admissible ranges or impose compositeness of $N$.Having a common root means \[ \exists r\in{\mathbb{Z}}/N{\mathbb{Z}}:\qquad f(r)=g(r)=0\quad\text{in }{\mathbb{Z}}/N{\mathbb{Z}}. \] The source does not prescribe $r$, so it is a variable of the construction rather than fixed input. The standard polynomial-selection interpretation of coprime is $\gcd_{{\mathbb{Q}}[x]}(f,g)=1$. It cannot mean $(f,g)={\mathbb{Z}}[x]$ for $N>1$, since a polynomial identity $Af+Bg=1$ with $A,B\in{\mathbb{Z}}[x]$ would contradict the common-root condition upon evaluation modulo $N$. The intended irreducibility convention and any primitive or content normalization should be checked against the report.
The optimization objective is unresolved. For example, one possible scalar objective would minimize \[ H(f,g)=\max\left(\{|a_i|:0\le i\le d_f\}\cup\{|b_j|:0\le j\le d_g\}\right) \] over all admissible pairs, but the record does not select this objective rather than separate heights, weighted or skewed norms, or another comparison of coefficients. Nor does it supply a conjectural minimum, asymptotic rate in $N$, or computational complexity requirement. Thus the requested construction must retain the prescribed degrees, irreducibility, coprimality, common modular root, and a genuinely optimal coefficient criterion once that criterion is recovered; the example height above is not silently adopted as the source's definition.
Short English statement
The problem asks for optimally small integer polynomials of prescribed degrees that are irreducible, coprime over the rationals, and share a root modulo the input modulus. The exact meaning of optimal coefficient size and the admissible input conventions still need specification.Sources
- Local UnsolvedMath registry, permanent ID 30000274, code catalogue entry, "Minimal-Coefficient Polynomial Selection for the Number Field Sieve." Proposed year 2005; proposer unspecified.
- Explicit Methods in Number Theory (2006), Oberwolfach Reports, pp. 1799--1866, DOI 10.4171/owr/2005/32; https://doi.org/10.4171/owr/2005/32. The displayed report year 2006 differs from the DOI and proposed year 2005.
- Supplied reference "On nonlinear polynomial selection": https://eprint.iacr.org/2011/292.pdf.
- Supplied reference "Montgomery polynomial selection": https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6011.
- Statement status corrected_verified; the supplied verification only says TeX commands and variables were enclosed in balanced inline math.
- Literature triage checked 2026-08-21: partially solved. It reports effective number-field-sieve constructions and improved bounds for many degree choices, but no complete solution of generally smallest coefficients. This is a dated supplied assessment requiring independent verification. Created 2026-08-25; updated 2026-09-16.
- Registry curation by Ulam AI / UnsolvedMath Contributors, CC BY 4.0; underlying report and literature provenance remain as supplied. Unreviewed statement-only draft.
Statement licence: CC-BY-SA-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.