Kourovka Notebook Problem 9.14
Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
A group $G$ is locally finite if $\langle S\rangle$ is finite for every finite subset $S\subseteq G$. A subgroup $A\leq G$ is periodic if every $a\in A$ has finite order, and is abelian if its elements commute with one another.For subgroups $A,B\leq G$, write $AB=\{ab:a\in A,\ b\in B\}$. There are two potentially different meanings of subgroups that "commute": setwise permutability, $AB=BA$, and elementwise commutation, $ab=ba$ for all $a\in A$, $b\in B$. The supplied wording does not explicitly distinguish them.
Under the finite-product reading and the interpretation of commuting as setwise permutability, the question has the following precise candidate formulation: for every integer $m\geq1$, every group $G$, and all periodic abelian subgroups $A_1,\ldots,A_m\leq G$ satisfying \[ G=A_1A_2\cdots A_m, \qquad A_iA_j=A_jA_i\quad(1\leq i,j\leq m), \] must $G$ be locally finite? Here $A_1\cdots A_m=\{a_1\cdots a_m:a_i\in A_i\}$.
If elementwise commutation is intended, the pairwise condition instead reads \[ \forall i,j\in\{1,\ldots,m\}\ \forall a\in A_i\ \forall b\in A_j, \qquad ab=ba. \] These interpretations are recorded separately; the supplied text does not establish which is intended. It also does not explicitly specify whether the number of factors must be finite. Thus the displayed finite-product formulation is conditional on that reading, and an intended infinite-product formulation would require an additional definition of the product.
The source states that the answer is affirmative for two subgroups. This assertion is retained as supplied background, with the same unresolved convention concerning commuting subgroups.
Short English statement
D. I. Zaitsev asks whether a group expressed as a product of pairwise commuting periodic abelian subgroups must be locally finite. The source reports an affirmative answer for two factors. The meaning of commuting subgroups and the permitted number of factors require clarification.Sources
- Supplied local UnsolvedMath registry record: permanent ID $700549$, exact source code
catalogue entry, title Kourovka Notebook Problem 9.14; upstream revisiond371ee917ac9647fbb06cd6fc529deec6f3dda82. - The Kourovka Notebook (Unsolved Problems in Group Theory), problem 9.14, attributed to D. I. Zaitsev in the 9th issue (1984). The supplied record also identifies the 21st issue edition (2026),
arXiv:1401.0300v48. The collection description names E. I. Khukhro and V. D. Mazurov as editors. These bibliographic details are supplied attribution and have not been independently checked. - The registry labels the problem
openand states that the two-subgroup case has an affirmative answer. These are supplied status and background assertions, not independently verified mathematical or literature assessments. No separate citation for the two-subgroup assertion is supplied.
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.