Math-1593 · mathematics · Topology

Math-1593

Kirby Problem 2.44

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let $S$ be a connected orientable surface of infinite type: it is not homeomorphic to a compact surface with finitely many points removed. Work without boundary, or use interiors when a boundary convention is needed. Given a homeomorphism $f:S\to S$, form the mapping torus \[ M_f=(S\times[0,1])/\left((x,1)\sim(f(x),0)\right). \] It is a three-manifold fibering over the circle, with fiber $S$. No compactness or finite-volume assumption is imposed on $M_f$.

Characterize the homeomorphisms $f$ for which $M_f$ admits a complete Riemannian metric of constant sectional curvature $-1$. The metric need not be unique, and completeness is part of the hyperbolic-structure requirement. Criteria may depend on the action of $f$ on curves, subsurfaces, and the ends of $S$; finite-type pseudo-Anosov terminology alone is not a definition of the desired infinite-type class.

For mapping tori that are hyperbolic, ask also whether $M_f$ is homeomorphic to the interior of a compact hyperbolic three-manifold with totally geodesic boundary. The latter means a compact manifold carrying a curvature $-1$ metric whose boundary components have zero second fundamental form. This is a topological identification with that interior, not a requirement that its incomplete restricted metric equal the chosen complete metric on $M_f$.

The second assertion is a further finiteness and geometric condition, and must be distinguished from the first existence question.

Short English statement

Which infinite-type surface maps have hyperbolic mapping tori, and when do those tori admit compact cores with totally geodesic boundary?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.