Math-1985 · mathematics · Dynamical systems

Math-1985

Invariant line fields on Julia sets

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let $f:\widehat{\mathbb C}\to\widehat{\mathbb C}$ be a rational map of degree at least two. Its Julia set $J(f)$ is the complement of the open set on which the iterates form a normal family. A measurable invariant line field on $J(f)$ means a measurable choice of an unoriented real tangent line $\ell(z)\subset T_z\widehat{\mathbb C}$ on an invariant measurable subset $E\subset J(f)$ of positive spherical area, such that \[ Df_z(\ell(z))=\ell(f(z)) \quad\text{for almost every }z\in E. \] Invariance of $E$ is modulo area-zero sets. Critical points, a finite set, do not affect the almost-everywhere condition.

A Lattès map is a rational map arising from an affine expanding map $L(w)=aw+b$ of a complex torus $\mathbb C/\Lambda$, where $a\Lambda\subset\Lambda$ and $|a|>1$, by a finite holomorphic quotient $\pi:\mathbb C/\Lambda\to\widehat{\mathbb C}$ satisfying $f\pi=\pi L$.

Does the existence of such a line field force $f$ to be a Lattès map? Equivalently, prove that every rational map outside this exceptional class has no measurable invariant line field supported on a positive-area part of its Julia set. The positive-area requirement excludes fields specified merely on countable or zero-area invariant sets. No continuity of the field is assumed, and line fields on Fatou components are outside the question.

Short English statement

Are rational maps with a measurable invariant line field on a positive-area part of their Julia set necessarily Lattès maps?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.