Hirzebruch's 1954 Problem List — Problem 3
Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
For an integer $n\geq 0$, let $\mathbb{P}^{n}({\mathbb{R}})=S^{n}/(x\sim -x)$ denote real projective space with its standard smooth structure. Define \[ e(n)=\min\{m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{\geq 0}:\text{there exists a smooth embedding }\mathbb{P}^{n}({\mathbb{R}})\hookrightarrow{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\},\qquad d(n)=e(n)-n. \] Here a smooth embedding is a smooth injective immersion that is a homeomorphism onto its image.The supplied historical statement attributes to H. Hopf the bound $d(n)>1$, including the assertion that this obstruction holds even for topological embeddings. It attributes to Chern the bound \[ d(n)>2\quad\text{if}\quad n\notin\{2^{k}-1:k\in{\mathbb{Z}},\ k\geq2\}\cup\{2^{k}-2:k\in{\mathbb{Z}},\ k\geq2\}. \] These are reproduced as attributed source claims with an unresolved dimension qualification: the supplied record does not specify the range of $n$, and the claims cannot hold as written for all positive integers, since $\mathbb{P}^{1}({\mathbb{R}})$ is a circle and embeds smoothly in ${\mathbb{R}}^{2}$. Thus the intended dimension range or low-dimensional exceptions must be checked before these bounds are adopted as hypotheses.
The general question is whether these lower bounds on the minimum embedding codimension can be improved, on their intended ranges of validity. The source does not prescribe a particular strengthened bound or a precise range for the improvement. Its explicit special question is: \[ \text{Does there exist a smooth embedding }\mathbb{P}^{6}({\mathbb{R}})\hookrightarrow{\mathbb{R}}^{8}\text{?} \] Equivalently, is $e(6)\leq8$, or $d(6)\leq2$? The smooth category here follows the source's definition of $d(n)$; its separate topological qualification concerns the attributed Hopf obstruction.
Short English statement
Ask whether the historical lower bounds for the Euclidean embedding codimension of real projective space can be strengthened, and specifically whether real projective $6$-space embeds smoothly in ${\mathbb{R}}^{8}$. The dimension range of the historical bounds needs clarification. The registry labels the problem open; this draft makes no independent assessment of its current status.Sources
- UnsolvedMath local registry, permanent ID $800054$, source problem code
catalogue entry, title: Hirzebruch's 1954 Problem List --- Problem 3. The supplied registry records Kotschick as proposer and $2013$ as proposed year, and labels the entry open; these are supplied metadata, not an independently verified historical attribution or current status assessment. - Kotschick, Updates on Hirzebruch's 1954 Problem List (2013), Problem 3, supplied source URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4623. The background identifies the extraction method as
arxiv_latexand records access on 2026-10-16. This access date is supplied provenance; no independent source visit or literature verification is claimed. - The supplied statement attributes the first embedding obstruction to H. Hopf and the second to Chern. No separate bibliographic references for those results are supplied. The historical problem is identified as belonging to Hirzebruch's 1954 list, as reproduced in the cited 2013 update.
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.