Math-3369 · mathematics · Logic

Math-3369

Fixed-point logic with counting

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Shared notation.
$\mathbb N=\{1,2,\ldots\}$, and $\mathbb Z,\mathbb Q,\mathbb R,\mathbb C$ denote the integers, rationals, reals and complex numbers. Any other conventions are specified locally.

Fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) extends first-order logic on finite structures by inflationary fixed-point operators and counting terms on an ordered numerical sort; no order on the graph's vertices or matrix indices is assumed. A perfect matching in a finite graph is a set of edges incident exactly once with each vertex. For the matrix question, follow the original BGS representation: the input contains a finite field $K$ with its field operations and a linear order on $K$, a separate unordered finite index set $I$, and a function $M:I\times I\to K$. Rows and columns have the same index set; their common reordering does not change $\det(M)$. The order on $K$ need not be compatible with its field operations.

Statement recorded in the supplied source.
(1) Is there an FPC sentence defining the existence of a perfect matching in every finite graph? (2) Is there a uniform FPC formula $\theta(a)$ in the stated matrix vocabulary which, for every such finite-field matrix and $a\in K$, holds exactly when $a=\det(M)$? Both parts ask for uniform definitions independent of graph order, matrix dimension and index ordering. [S2] [S3]

Short English statement

Can fixed-point logic with counting recognize perfect matchings, and can it compute the determinant of a square matrix with unordered indices over a finite field?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.