Math-5416 · mathematics · Mathematics

Math-5416

Erdős Problem #83

Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status

Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolved

Statement

Let $\mathcal F\subseteq\binom{[4n]}{2n}$ satisfy $|A\cap B|\geq2$ for all $A,B\in\mathcal F$. Prove \[ |\mathcal F|\leq\frac12\left(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}{n}^2\right). \] This is a known special case of the complete intersection theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian. We state the external extremal theorem precisely and supply the parameter calculation, exact count and sharpness verification. Its general extremal proof is not reproduced.

Restatement from Math-5416-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.

Original problem on erdosproblems.com

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

Math-5416-A1 · No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt 6 astra ultra ·

GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5416

Erdős Problem 83: the sharp two-intersection bound

1) Statement

Let $\mathcal F\subseteq\binom{[4n]}{2n}$ satisfy $|A\cap B|\geq2$ for all $A,B\in\mathcal F$. Prove \[ |\mathcal F|\leq\frac12\left(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}{n}^2\right). \] This is a known special case of the complete intersection theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian. We state the external extremal theorem precisely and supply the parameter calculation, exact count and sharpness verification. Its general extremal proof is not reproduced.

2) Applying the complete intersection theorem

In the nontrivial range of parameters, the theorem determines the largest $t$-intersecting family of $k$-subsets of $[m]$. If \[ \frac1{r+1}\leq \frac{m-2k+2t-2}{(t-1)(k-t+1)}<\frac1r, \] an extremal family is \[ \left\{A\in\binom{[m]}k:|A\cap[t+2r]|\geq t+r\right\}. \] As usual the upper endpoint is interpreted as infinity for $r=0$; ties at the other endpoint do not affect the maximum cardinality.

For $n\geq2$, put $m=4n$, $k=2n$, $t=2$ and $r=n-1$. The middle fraction becomes $2/(2n-1)$, and \[ \frac1n<\frac2{2n-1}<\frac1{n-1}. \] The theorem therefore bounds $|\mathcal F|$ by the size of \[ \mathcal A= \left\{A\in\binom{[4n]}{2n}:|A\cap[2n]|\geq n+1\right\}. \] For $n=1$ the conclusion is immediate: distinct two-element sets cannot intersect in two elements, so $|\mathcal F|\leq1$.

3) Exact enumeration and attainment

Fixing $j=|A\cap[2n]|$ gives \[ |\mathcal A|=\sum_{j=n+1}^{2n} \binom{2n}j\binom{2n}{2n-j} =\sum_{j=n+1}^{2n}\binom{2n}j^2. \] Counting all $2n$-subsets of two disjoint blocks of size $2n$ gives Vandermonde's identity \[ \sum_{j=0}^{2n}\binom{2n}j^2=\binom{4n}{2n}. \] The terms indexed by $j$ and $2n-j$ agree. Removing the single middle term and halving therefore gives \[ |\mathcal A|=\frac12\left(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}n^2\right), \] which proves the required bound. Moreover, if $A,B\in\mathcal A$, then inside the first block their intersection has size at least $(n+1)+(n+1)-2n=2$. Thus $\mathcal A$ meets the hypothesis and attains the bound. It also gives attainment for $n=1$.

4) Outcome and sources

Outcome: SOLVED, known sharp bound reconstructed using the complete intersection theorem. Counting the proposed family alone would only prove a lower bound for the extremal quantity; the external theorem supplies the essential upper bound. The batch verification checks the finite counts and the displayed parameter inequalities. It does not verify the general theorem in Lean. The estimate measures coverage using the explicit external theorem, not novelty or a replacement proof of that theorem.

5) COMPLETION ESTIMATE

COMPLETION: 100%

Go to contribution →