Erdős Problem #83
Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status
Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolvedStatement
Let $\mathcal F\subseteq\binom{[4n]}{2n}$ satisfy $|A\cap B|\geq2$ for all $A,B\in\mathcal F$. Prove \[ |\mathcal F|\leq\frac12\left(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}{n}^2\right). \] This is a known special case of the complete intersection theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian. We state the external extremal theorem precisely and supply the parameter calculation, exact count and sharpness verification. Its general extremal proof is not reproduced.
Restatement from Math-5416-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.
Original problem on erdosproblems.com
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 1
GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5416
Erdős Problem 83: the sharp two-intersection bound
1) Statement
Let $\mathcal F\subseteq\binom{[4n]}{2n}$ satisfy $|A\cap B|\geq2$ for all $A,B\in\mathcal F$. Prove \[ |\mathcal F|\leq\frac12\left(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}{n}^2\right). \] This is a known special case of the complete intersection theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian. We state the external extremal theorem precisely and supply the parameter calculation, exact count and sharpness verification. Its general extremal proof is not reproduced.2) Applying the complete intersection theorem
In the nontrivial range of parameters, the theorem determines the largest $t$-intersecting family of $k$-subsets of $[m]$. If \[ \frac1{r+1}\leq \frac{m-2k+2t-2}{(t-1)(k-t+1)}<\frac1r, \] an extremal family is \[ \left\{A\in\binom{[m]}k:|A\cap[t+2r]|\geq t+r\right\}. \] As usual the upper endpoint is interpreted as infinity for $r=0$; ties at the other endpoint do not affect the maximum cardinality.For $n\geq2$, put $m=4n$, $k=2n$, $t=2$ and $r=n-1$. The middle fraction becomes $2/(2n-1)$, and \[ \frac1n<\frac2{2n-1}<\frac1{n-1}. \] The theorem therefore bounds $|\mathcal F|$ by the size of \[ \mathcal A= \left\{A\in\binom{[4n]}{2n}:|A\cap[2n]|\geq n+1\right\}. \] For $n=1$ the conclusion is immediate: distinct two-element sets cannot intersect in two elements, so $|\mathcal F|\leq1$.
3) Exact enumeration and attainment
Fixing $j=|A\cap[2n]|$ gives \[ |\mathcal A|=\sum_{j=n+1}^{2n} \binom{2n}j\binom{2n}{2n-j} =\sum_{j=n+1}^{2n}\binom{2n}j^2. \] Counting all $2n$-subsets of two disjoint blocks of size $2n$ gives Vandermonde's identity \[ \sum_{j=0}^{2n}\binom{2n}j^2=\binom{4n}{2n}. \] The terms indexed by $j$ and $2n-j$ agree. Removing the single middle term and halving therefore gives \[ |\mathcal A|=\frac12\left(\binom{4n}{2n}-\binom{2n}n^2\right), \] which proves the required bound. Moreover, if $A,B\in\mathcal A$, then inside the first block their intersection has size at least $(n+1)+(n+1)-2n=2$. Thus $\mathcal A$ meets the hypothesis and attains the bound. It also gives attainment for $n=1$.4) Outcome and sources
Outcome: SOLVED, known sharp bound reconstructed using the complete intersection theorem. Counting the proposed family alone would only prove a lower bound for the extremal quantity; the external theorem supplies the essential upper bound. The batch verification checks the finite counts and the displayed parameter inequalities. It does not verify the general theorem in Lean.- R. Ahlswede and L. H. Khachatrian, The Complete Intersection Theorem for Systems of Finite Sets, European Journal of Combinatorics 18 $1997$, 125--136, main theorem and equations $1.7$--$1.10$,
https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/ahlswede/homepage/public/122.pdf. - T. F. Bloom, Problem 83,
https://www.erdosproblems.com/83, checked 23 September 2026.