Erdős Problem #800
Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status
Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolvedStatement
If an $n$-vertex graph $G$ has no adjacent pair of vertices both of degree at least three, then $R(G)\leq12n$. We reconstruct Alon's proof: https://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~nogaa/PDFS/rams.pdf, Subdivided graphs have linear Ramsey numbers, Proposition 1.3. See https://www.erdosproblems.com/800. The external input is the following theorem of Sidorenko and, independently, Goddard--Kleitman: every graph on $2e+1$ vertices with independence number at most two contains every $e$-edge graph without isolated vertices as a subgraph. It is stated as Theorem 2.1 in the cited primary source.
Restatement from Math-5906-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.
Original problem on erdosproblems.com
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 1
GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5906
Erdős Problem 800: a linear Ramsey bound for subdivided graphs
Statement and claim.
If an $n$-vertex graph $G$ has no adjacent pair of vertices both of degree at least three, then $R(G)\leq12n$. We reconstruct Alon's proof: https://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~nogaa/PDFS/rams.pdf, Subdivided graphs have linear Ramsey numbers, Proposition 1.3. See https://www.erdosproblems.com/800. The external input is the following theorem of Sidorenko and, independently, Goddard--Kleitman: every graph on $2e+1$ vertices with independence number at most two contains every $e$-edge graph without isolated vertices as a subgraph. It is stated as Theorem 2.1 in the cited primary source.Separating the high-degree vertices.
The vertices of degree at least three are independent. Extend them to an inclusion-maximal independent set $W$. Every vertex outside $W$ has a neighbour in $W$ and total degree at most two. Consequently each component of $G-W$ is either an isolated vertex or one edge. An isolated vertex has one or two neighbours in $W$; each endpoint of a component edge has exactly one neighbour in $W$. The two neighbours may coincide.Form a simple auxiliary graph $H$ on $W$: join different $w,w'$ whenever a component of $G-W$ provides a path between them with one or two internal vertices. Distinct components have disjoint internal vertices, so $e(H)\leq n-|W|\leq n$. Several components may provide the same auxiliary edge; we keep only one copy in $H$.
Finding a compatible image of $W$.
Consider any red-blue colouring of $K_{12n}$. Call a vertex red if its red degree is at least $6n$, and blue otherwise; a blue vertex has blue degree at least $6n$, since its red degree is at most $6n-1$. After interchanging colours, choose $6n$ red vertices and call their set $U$. On $U$, form a graph $T$ joining pairs with at least $2n$ common red neighbours in the original complete graph.There cannot be three mutually nonadjacent vertices $u_1,u_2,u_3$ in $T$. Otherwise their red neighbourhoods would have union of size at least \[ 3(6n)-3(2n-1)>12n, \] by the elementary lower inclusion--exclusion bound. Thus $\alpha(T)\leq2$. Apply the external theorem to the nonisolated part of $H$, which has at most $n$ edges. There is ample room in $T$ for its $2e(H)+1$ required vertices, and afterwards for all isolated vertices of $H$. We obtain distinct images $w''\in U$ for all $w\in W$, such that every auxiliary edge has endpoints with at least $2n$ common red neighbours.
Embedding each remaining component.
Process the components of $G-W$ one by one. Fewer than $n$ vertices have been used at each stage. An isolated component vertex with one neighbour $w\in W$ can be placed at any unused red neighbour of $w''$; there are at least $6n$ before removing used vertices. With two neighbours in $W$, use an unused common red neighbour, from a set of size at least $2n$.For an edge component $uv$, let its neighbours in $W$ be $w,w'$. If $w\ne w'$, more than $n$ unused common red neighbours of $w'',w'''$ remain. If this set has a red edge, use its ends for $u,v$. If it has no red edge, it contains a blue $K_n$, and hence a blue copy of $G$. If $w=w'$, use instead at least $n$ unused red neighbours of $w''$, with the same red-edge-or-blue-clique conclusion. The additional red adjacencies possibly created by this procedure are harmless: Ramsey copies are subgraphs, not induced subgraphs.