Erdős Problem #780
Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status
Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolvedStatement
Let the $r$-subsets of $[n]$ be coloured with $t$ colours. If \[ n\geq kr+(t-1)(k-1), \] must there be $k$ pairwise disjoint $r$-sets of one colour? Yes. We reconstruct a consensus-division proof for prime $k$, then give an elementary product reduction and the sharp lower construction. Attempt status: solved relative to the explicitly stated consensus-division theorem.
Restatement from Math-5890-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.
Original problem on erdosproblems.com
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 1
GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5890
Erdős Problem #780: disjoint edges in one colour
Statement and outcome
Let the $r$-subsets of $[n]$ be coloured with $t$ colours. If \[ n\geq kr+(t-1)(k-1), \] must there be $k$ pairwise disjoint $r$-sets of one colour? Yes. We reconstruct a consensus-division proof for prime $k$, then give an elementary product reduction and the sharp lower construction. Attempt status: solved relative to the explicitly stated consensus-division theorem.The topological input
We use the following consensus-division theorem for a prime $p$. Given $t$ real-valued functions on measurable subsets of $[0,1]$, each uniformly continuous for the metric \[ d(E,F)=\mu(E\mathbin{\triangle}F), \] there is a partition into $p$ pieces, each a union of intervals, with at most $(p-1)t$ cuts, such that every function takes the same value on every piece. The functions need not be additive measures. This theorem is an external input, not proved here.Prime number of disjoint edges
Suppose $k=p$ is prime and the colouring is $c:\binom{[n]}r\to[t]$. Divide $[0,1]$ into $n$ equal open cells $I_j=((j-1)/n,j/n)$, ignoring endpoints of measure zero. For each colour $i$, define on $[0,1]^n$ \[ u_i(x)=\max_{\substack{B\in\binom{[n]}r\\c(B)=i}}\ \min_{j\in B}x_j, \] with an empty maximum equal to zero. The finite maximum of these coordinate minima is $1$-Lipschitz for the supremum norm. For measurable $E$, set \[ x_j(E)=n\mu(E\cap I_j),\qquad v_i(E)=u_i(x(E)). \] Then $|v_i(E)-v_i(F)|\leq n\mu(E\triangle F)$, so the theorem applies.Let $P_1,\ldots,P_p$ be the resulting pieces. At most $(p-1)t$ open cells contain a cut. Every remaining cell lies, up to endpoints, wholly in a single piece. The hypothesis gives \[ n-(p-1)t\geq p(r-1)+1. \] By pigeonhole some piece contains at least $r$ whole cells, indexed by a set $B$. If $c(B)=i$, then $v_i(P_s)=1$ for that piece, and equality of values gives $v_i(P_j)=1$ for every $j$. By the definition of the finite maximum, each $P_j$ therefore contains full measure in all cells indexed by an $r$-set $B_j$ of colour $i$. The $B_j$ are pairwise disjoint: a cell of positive measure cannot lie with full measure in two disjoint pieces. These are the required $p$ edges.