Erdős Problem #772
Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status
Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolvedStatement
For fixed $k$, suppose $|A|=n$, $A\subset\mathbb N$, and the ordered representation function $r_A(s)=1_A*1_A(s)$ is at most $k$ for every $s$. Must $A$ contain a Sidon subset of size larger than $n^{1/2+c}$ for some $c>0$? We prove the stronger bound \[ \max_{\substack{B\subseteq A\\B\ {\rm Sidon}}}|B| \geq \frac{3}{4(4k)^{1/3}}n^{2/3}-\frac14. \tag{1} \] Thus for every fixed $k$, any fixed $c<1/6$ works for sufficiently large $n$. Attempt status: solved for both questions. A Sidon set here requires equality of two unordered pairs, allowing a repeated element, to be trivial.
Restatement from Math-5884-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.
Original problem on erdosproblems.com
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 1
GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5884
Erdős Problem #772: extracting a Sidon subset
Statement and outcome
For fixed $k$, suppose $|A|=n$, $A\subset\mathbb N$, and the ordered representation function $r_A(s)=1_A*1_A(s)$ is at most $k$ for every $s$. Must $A$ contain a Sidon subset of size larger than $n^{1/2+c}$ for some $c>0$? We prove the stronger bound \[ \max_{\substack{B\subseteq A\\B\ {\rm Sidon}}}|B| \geq \frac{3}{4(4k)^{1/3}}n^{2/3}-\frac14. \tag{1} \] Thus for every fixed $k$, any fixed $c<1/6$ works for sufficiently large $n$. Attempt status: solved for both questions. A Sidon set here requires equality of two unordered pairs, allowing a repeated element, to be trivial.Counting both kinds of obstruction
A nontrivial equality $a+b=c+d$ has either four distinct elements, or three distinct elements with one the midpoint of the other two. Indeed, if two distinct unordered pairs share an element, cancellation makes them equal; and $2a=2b$ forces $a=b$.The number of four-element subsets containing an additive obstruction is at most \[ \sum_s r_A(s)^2\leq k\sum_s r_A(s)=kn^2. \tag{2} \] This deliberately loose bound avoids ordering conventions: every bad four-set has at least one ordered witness counted on the left.
The number of bad three-sets is at most $kn$. To see this, choose the midpoint $b\in A$; there are at most $r_A(2b)\leq k$ ordered endpoint pairs. Each bad triple is counted at least once. In particular, these three-element obstructions cannot be assigned survival probability $p^4$.
Random selection and deletion
Independently retain each element of $A$ with probability \[ p=(4kn)^{-1/3}\leq1. \] Let $X$ be the number retained, $Y_4$ the number of retained bad four-sets, and $Y_3$ the number of retained bad three-sets. Then \[ \mathbb E(X-Y_4-Y_3) \geq np-kn^2p^4-knp^3 =\frac34np-\frac14. \] Some outcome has at least this value. For that outcome, repeatedly delete one vertex from any remaining bad set. Deleting vertices creates no new obstruction, so at most $Y_4+Y_3$ deletions are needed. The remaining set is Sidon and has size at least $X-Y_4-Y_3$. This proves $1$.For fixed $k$, dividing $1$ by $\sqrt n$ tends to infinity. Moreover, if $0<c<1/6$, dividing $1$ by $n^{1/2+c}$ also tends to infinity. This verifies the strict inequality requested in the problem, not just an unspecified improvement in a constant.
Boundary cases and attribution
If $k=1$, there is no admissible $A$ of size $n\geq2$, because two distinct elements give two ordered representations of their sum. The asymptotic question is substantive for the nonvacuous fixed values of $k$; the proved conditional statement covers every admissible $A$. For $k=2$, every admissible set is already Sidon, since a nontrivial repeated-pair coincidence would give at least three ordered representations. No universal $n^{2/3}$ upper bound for this exceptional parameter is asserted.The alteration method is the known Alon--Erdős argument; the proof above includes the three-element obstruction correction explicitly. Reference: N. Alon and P. Erdős, An application of graph theory to additive number theory, European J. Combin. 6 $1985$, 201--203. Statement and reference checked at https://www.erdosproblems.com/772 and https://www.erdosproblems.com/latex/772 on 24 September 2026. No external Sidon extraction theorem, novelty, or local Lean verification is claimed.