Math-5727 · mathematics · Mathematics

Math-5727

Erdős Problem #546

Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status

Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolved

Statement

For a graph $G$ with $m$ edges and no isolated vertices, must its two-colour Ramsey number satisfy $R(G)\leq2^{O(\sqrt m)}$?

Restatement from Math-5727-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.

Original problem on erdosproblems.com

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

Math-5727-A1 · No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt 6 astra ultra ·

GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5727

Erdős problem 546. For a graph $G$ with $m$ edges and no isolated vertices, must its two-colour Ramsey number satisfy $R(G)\leq2^{O(\sqrt m)}$?

Status and exact external theorem. Yes. Sudakov's Theorem 1.1 in A conjecture of Erdős on graph Ramsey numbers states \[ R(G)\leq2^{250\sqrt m}. \] The hypothesis is precisely that $G$ has $m$ edges and no isolated vertices; no bounded-degree, connectedness, or bipartiteness assumption is needed. Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.0095; problem: https://www.erdosproblems.com/546, checked 24 September 2026. This theorem is the external input for the full upper bound. Its sparse-colouring machinery is not reproduced here. We independently prove the dense special case, the necessity of the square-root scale, and the role of the no-isolates assumption.

An elementary bound and the dense special case. Let $r(s,t)$ force either a red $K_s$ or a blue $K_t$. Looking at the two colour neighbourhoods of one vertex proves \[ r(s,t)\leq r(s-1,t)+r(s,t-1). \] Indeed, in a complete graph on the number of vertices on the right, some vertex has at least $r(s-1,t)$ red neighbours or at least $r(s,t-1)$ blue neighbours, since its total degree is one less than that number. Add the vertex to the appropriate smaller monochromatic clique. With $r(1,t)=r(s,1)=1$, Pascal's identity yields \[ r(s,t)\leq\binom{s+t-2}{s-1}. \] Consequently, for a graph on $v$ vertices, $R(G)\leq r(v,v)\leq 2^{2v-2}$. The degree sum gives $v\leq2m$ when there are no isolated vertices. This proves a general elementary upper bound $2^{4m-2}$ for $m\geq1$, and already proves the required $2^{O(\sqrt m)}$ bound in every family with $v=O(\sqrt m)$. It is the sparse graphs with many vertices relative to $\sqrt m$ that this elementary argument does not settle.

Why a smaller order of exponent cannot hold universally. Take $G=K_t$, so $m=t(t-1)/2$, and set $N=\lfloor2^{t/4}\rfloor$. Independently colour every edge of $K_N$ red or blue with equal probability. A fixed $t$-set is monochromatic with probability $2^{1-\binom t2}$. Hence the expected number of monochromatic $K_t$ copies is at most \[ \binom Nt2^{1-\binom t2} \leq2^{\,t^2/4+1-t(t-1)/2} =2^{-t^2/4+t/2+1}<1 \] for $t\geq4$. Some colouring therefore has no monochromatic $K_t$, and $R(K_t)>N$. Since $t>\sqrt{2m}$, this gives $R(K_t)\geq2^{c\sqrt m}$ for an absolute $c>0$ and all sufficiently large $t$. Thus an exponent $o(\sqrt m)$ cannot replace the one in the problem.

Boundary conditions. If isolated vertices were allowed without restriction, adjoining arbitrarily many of them would leave $m$ fixed while $R(G)\geq|V(G)|$ grew without bound. Their exclusion is essential. With $m=0$ and no isolated vertices, the only graph is empty, handled separately by the convention for its Ramsey number. No conclusion for three or more colours is inferred from the two-colour theorem.

Completion estimate. The full upper bound follows from the explicitly cited Sudakov theorem; the scale, dense case, and necessary hypothesis are independently justified above. COMPLETION: 100%

Go to contribution →