Erdős Problem #523
Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status
Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 35% cataloguedSolvedSolvedStatement
Erdős #523; an almost-sure upper bound, 2026-09-24. Let $(\epsilon_j)_{j\geq0}$ be one sequence of independent symmetric signs, and put $F_n(z)=\sum_{j=0}^n\epsilon_jz^j$. Is there a constant $C>0$ such that almost surely $\max_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)|=(C+o(1))\sqrt{n\log n}$?
Restatement from Math-5712-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.
Original problem on erdosproblems.com
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 1
GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5712
FORMAL RESTATEMENT
Erdős #523; an almost-sure upper bound, 2026-09-24. Let $(\epsilon_j)_{j\geq0}$ be one sequence of independent symmetric signs, and put $F_n(z)=\sum_{j=0}^n\epsilon_jz^j$. Is there a constant $C>0$ such that almost surely $\max_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)|=(C+o(1))\sqrt{n\log n}$?QUICK LITERATURE AND CONTEXT CHECK
The problem page attributes the sharp answer $C=1$ to Halász, following the order-of-magnitude work of Salem--Zygmund. This attempt proves an almost-sure upper estimate with an explicit larger constant and a deterministic lower bound. The sharp logarithmic lower bound and convergence to the constant one are not claimed.OBJECTIVE AND ATTACK PLAN
Control the random polynomial at a fine deterministic grid using an exponential-moment bound, pass to the entire circle using a deterministic derivative estimate, and apply Borel--Cantelli on the single infinite sign probability space.WORK
A fixed-point tail bound. If $S=\sum_{j=0}^n a_j\epsilon_j$ with real $|a_j|\leq1$, independence and $\cosh x\leq e^{x^2/2}$ give \[ \mathbb E e^{uS}=\prod_j\cosh(ua_j) \leq e^{u^2(n+1)/2}. \] Markov's inequality, optimized at $u=v/(n+1)$ and applied to both signs, gives $\mathbb P(|S|\geq v)\leq2e^{-v^2/[2(n+1)]}$. At any fixed angle $\theta$, the real and imaginary parts of $F_n(e^{i\theta})$ have coefficients bounded by one. A complex number of modulus at least $v$ has one of these parts of modulus at least $v/\sqrt2$, so \[ \mathbb P\left(|F_n(e^{i\theta})|\geq v\right) \leq4e^{-v^2/[4(n+1)]}. \tag{1} \] No independence of values at different angles is asserted or needed.Discretizing the circle. Take $L_n=\lceil n^3\rceil=n^3$ for $n\geq2$ and grid angles $2\pi j/L_n$, $0\leq j<L_n$. The derivative with respect to angle satisfies deterministically \[ \left|\frac d{d\theta}F_n(e^{i\theta})\right| \leq\sum_{j=0}^n j=\frac{n(n+1)}2. \] Every angle is within $\pi/L_n$ of a grid angle, using circular distance. Hence \[ \max_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)| \leq\max_{0\leq j<L_n}|F_n(e^{2\pi ij/L_n})| +\frac{\pi n(n+1)}{2L_n}. \tag{2} \] Set $v_n=5\sqrt{(n+1)\log(n+1)}$. A union bound and $1$ show \[ \mathbb P\left(\max_{j<L_n}|F_n(e^{2\pi ij/L_n})|\geq v_n\right) \leq4n^3(n+1)^{-25/4}. \] The right side is summable over $n$, since it is $O(n^{-13/4})$. Borel--Cantelli implies that almost surely only finitely many of these grid events occur. Combining this with $2$, whose additive error is $O(1/n)$, gives \[ \limsup_{n\to\infty} \frac{\max_{|z|=1}|F_n(z)|}{\sqrt{n\log n}}\leq5 \qquad\hbox{almost surely}. \tag{3} \] This argument requires no independence between different degrees $n$, so it applies to the coupled sequence of partial sums in the question.
A lower bound and the remaining gap. Orthogonality gives, for every sign choice, \[ \frac1{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}|F_n(e^{i\theta})|^2\,d\theta=n+1. \] Consequently the maximum modulus is at least $\sqrt{n+1}$. This lower bound lacks the factor $\sqrt{\log n}$ needed to match $3$. Obtaining that factor involves controlling many correlated large values, and obtaining the exact constant requires still finer estimates. Neither follows from the union bound above.
RESULT AND LIMITATIONS
Attempt status: unresolved. The almost-sure upper bound $3$, including its probability-space quantifier, is completely proved, as is the deterministic square-root lower bound. The sharp asymptotic with $C=1$ is a known result but is not reconstructed here. In particular the completion estimate does not represent an independent proof of Halász's theorem.SOURCES
https://www.erdosproblems.com/523; G. Halász, On a result of Salem and Zygmund concerning random polynomials, Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica 8 $1973$, 369--377. The historical relationship of these maximum-modulus results is also recorded in Cook--Nguyen's primary paper, introduction: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07203.Completion rate estimate: 35%.