Math-5557 · mathematics · Mathematics

Math-5557

Erdős Problem #290

Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status

Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolved

Statement

Erdős #290; reconstruction of the elementary linear bound, 2026-09-24. For $a\geq1$, write $H_{a,b}=\sum_{n=a}^b1/n$ in lowest terms and let $s(a,b)$ be its positive denominator. Must some $b>a$ satisfy $s(a,b+1)<s(a,b)$? Give a quantitative upper bound for the first such $b$.

Restatement from Math-5557-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.

Original problem on erdosproblems.com

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

Math-5557-A1 · No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt 6 astra ultra ·

GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-5557

FORMAL RESTATEMENT

Erdős #290; reconstruction of the elementary linear bound, 2026-09-24. For $a\geq1$, write $H_{a,b}=\sum_{n=a}^b1/n$ in lowest terms and let $s(a,b)$ be its positive denominator. Must some $b>a$ satisfy $s(a,b+1)<s(a,b)$? Give a quantitative upper bound for the first such $b$.

QUICK LITERATURE AND CONTEXT CHECK

Wouter van Doorn answered this affirmatively and established a linear bound, with sharper constants and further refinements. The following proof reconstructs the simple power-of-three construction recorded on the problem page. It proves existence and $b(a)<6a$ for $a>1$, without importing van Doorn's deeper refinements. His paper indexes a drop by the newly added denominator; here $b$ is the preceding endpoint, as in the problem statement.

OBJECTIVE AND ATTACK PLAN

Choose an endpoint immediately before $2\cdot3^j$. The old reduced denominator contains $3^j$ and is even. Consequently the added term introduces no new denominator factor, while it cancels at least one factor of three.

WORK

We use the elementary valuation rule: if exactly one rational summand has the smallest $p$-adic valuation, the sum has that valuation. To verify it, multiply by a power of $p$ so that the exceptional summand is a unit and all other summands are divisible by $p$, then reduce modulo $p$.

An even-denominator lemma. In any interval of consecutive positive integers, the largest exponent of $2$ dividing an integer occurs at a unique integer. Indeed, if two different integers have maximal exponent $h$, they are $2^h$ times odd integers. Between them lies a multiple of $2^{h+1}$, contradicting maximality. Therefore a reciprocal sum over an interval containing an even integer has an even reduced denominator: the term corresponding to that unique integer has strictly smallest $2$-adic valuation.

Let $a>1$ and choose the unique integer $j\geq1$ with \[ 3^{j-1}<a\leq3^j. \] Put $P=3^j$ and $b=2P-1$. Then $b>a$. Among the integers in $[a,2P-1]$, the only multiple of $P$ is $P$ itself, and none is divisible by $3P$. It follows that \[ v_3(H_{a,b})=-j. \tag{1} \] Writing $H_{a,b}=r/s$ in lowest terms, $1$ says $3^j\mid s$ and $3^{j+1}\nmid s$.

The interval also contains $P+1$, which is even and at most $2P-1$ because $P\geq3$. By the lemma $2\mid s$. Since $P$ is odd, $2P\mid s$, so \[ H_{a,b+1}=\frac rs+\frac1{2P} =\frac{r+s/(2P)}s. \tag{2} \] Thus its reduced denominator divides $s$; no prime exponent can increase.

It remains to check that some exponent actually decreases. Work in the ring of rationals whose reduced denominators are coprime to $3$. Every summand $P/n$ with $a\leq n\leq2P-1$, $n\neq P$, is divisible by $3$ in this ring, whereas $P/P=1$. Hence \[ P H_{a,b}\equiv1\pmod3,\qquad P H_{a,b+1}\equiv1+\frac12\equiv0\pmod3. \tag{3} \] Equation $3$ gives $v_3(H_{a,b+1})\geq-j+1$, so the new reduced denominator has at most $3^{j-1}$ as its power of three. Together with $2$, this proves \[ s(a,b+1)\mid s(a,b)/3, \qquad s(a,b+1)<s(a,b). \tag{4} \] Since $P<3a$, our endpoint satisfies $b=2P-1<6a$.

For $a=1$, take $b=5$: $H_{1,5}=137/60$ and $H_{1,6}=49/20$, so the denominator also drops. This covers every positive starting point.

VERIFICATION AND SCOPE

The argument proves an explicit witness for every $a>1$, and a separate exact witness for $a=1$. It proves the linear upper growth bound requested in the question, not an asymptotic formula for the smallest witness. The published improvements below $4.374a$ and the logarithmic lower estimates require additional arguments and are not claimed as reproduced here. The existence proof itself uses only the valuation facts proved above.

SOURCES

CONCLUSION

Attempt status: solved for existence and a linear upper bound. A fully proved choice is $b=2\cdot3^j-1<6a$, where $3^{j-1}<a\leq3^j$, together with $b=5$ for $a=1$. Completion rate estimate: 100% of the existence and $O(a)$ growth assertion.

Go to contribution →