Math-6259 · mathematics · Mathematics

Math-6259

Erdős Problem #1205

Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status

Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolved

Statement

Put $N=\lfloor x\rfloor$. For each modulus $1\le n\le N$, choose one residue class, and maximize the minimum number of chosen classes containing an integer $1\le m\le N$. Denote this optimum by $F(N)$. We prove \[ \log N-O(\sqrt{\log N\log\log N})\le F(N)\le\log N+O(1), \] and hence $F(x)\sim\log x$. This reconstructs the random-choice argument recorded with the problem, with the exceptional-point repair and finite-interval averaging made explicit.

Restatement from Math-6259-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.

Original problem on erdosproblems.com

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

Math-6259-A1 · No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt 6 astra ultra ·

GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-6259

Erdős Problem 1205: almost uniform covering and a repair step

Statement and outcome

Put $N=\lfloor x\rfloor$. For each modulus $1\le n\le N$, choose one residue class, and maximize the minimum number of chosen classes containing an integer $1\le m\le N$. Denote this optimum by $F(N)$. We prove \[ \log N-O(\sqrt{\log N\log\log N})\le F(N)\le\log N+O(1), \] and hence $F(x)\sim\log x$. This reconstructs the random-choice argument recorded with the problem, with the exceptional-point repair and finite-interval averaging made explicit.

The finite-interval upper bound

Let $C(m)$ be the coverage of $m$. A residue class modulo $n$ contains at most $\lceil N/n\rceil$ members of $[1,N]$. Thus \[ NF(N)\le\sum_{m=1}^NC(m) \le\sum_{n=1}^N\lceil N/n\rceil \le N H_N+N, \] where $H_N=\sum_{n\le N}1/n$. Consequently $F(N)\le H_N+1=\log N+O(1)$.

For this finite domain the stronger intermediate assertion $F(N)\le H_N$ need not hold. At $N=3$, choose the obligatory class modulo one, the odd class modulo two, and the class $2$ modulo three. Each of $1,2,3$ is covered twice, so $F(3)\ge2>H_3$. This does not affect the asymptotic theorem.

Randomly cover almost all points

Let $M=\lfloor N/2\rfloor$, and independently choose a uniformly random class for each $n\le M$. For every fixed $m\in[1,N]$ its initial coverage is a sum $X_m$ of independent Bernoulli variables with \[ \mu=\mathbb E X_m=H_M. \] The distribution does not depend on $m$, even for $m>M$. The standard lower-tail Chernoff bound says, for $0<t<\mu$, \[ \mathbb P(X_m<\mu-t)\le\exp\left(-\frac{t^2}{2\mu}\right). \tag{1} \] For completeness, exponential Markov gives $\mathbb P(X_m\le\mu-t)\le\exp(s(\mu-t)+\mu(e^{-s}-1))$ for $s>0$; the inequality $e^{-s}\le1-s+s^2/2$ and $s=t/\mu$ give $1$.

For sufficiently large $N$ take \[ t=\sqrt{8\mu\log\log N},\qquad K=\lfloor\mu-t\rfloor. \] Then $t<\mu$, $K>0$, and a point with $X_m<K$ has probability at most $(\log N)^{-4}$. By linearity of expectation there is a choice of the first $M$ classes with at most \[ B\le N(\log N)^{-4} \] such bad points. Independence between different points is unnecessary.

Use the unused moduli to repair every exception

Assign $K$ distinct unused moduli to each bad point, making the assignments for different bad points disjoint. For a modulus assigned to $m$, choose the class $m$ modulo that modulus. This is possible because \[ BK\le \frac{N(\log N+1)}{(\log N)^4}<N-M \] for all sufficiently large $N$. Every bad point now receives at least $K$ additional covers, and every good point retains its initial $K$ covers. Set the remaining classes arbitrarily. We have constructed a system covering all $N$ points at least $K$ times.

Finally $\mu=\log N+O(1)$ and $t=O(\sqrt{\log N\log\log N})$, so the displayed lower bound follows. The repair uses each modulus once, and there is no requirement that its residue class cover only its assigned point. Extra coverage is harmless.

Assessment and attribution

Both asymptotic bounds are proved, including $F(x)\to\infty$. The only probabilistic estimate was derived above. Source: https://www.erdosproblems.com/1205; P. Erdős, A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory, Ann. Discrete Math. 6 $1980$, 89--115, p. 108. No novelty or formal-verification claim is made.

COMPLETION ESTIMATE

COMPLETION: 100%

Go to contribution →