Math-6250 · mathematics · Mathematics

Math-6250

Erdős Problem #1196

Status Solved · erdosproblems.comLLM status Solved from source status

Erdős problems openaigpt 6 astra ultra 100% cataloguedSolvedSolved

Statement

A set $A$ of positive integers is primitive if no two distinct members divide one another. For $A\subset[x,\infty)$, is \[ \sum_{a\in A}\frac1{a\log a}\le1+o(1)\qquad(x\to\infty) \] uniformly in $A$? Yes. We reconstruct the known von Mangoldt chain argument, using its invariant weight to obtain the explicit bound \[ \sum_{a\in A}\frac1{a\log a}\le\frac1{1-2/\log x}\qquad(x>e^2). \tag{1} \] This proves $1+O(1/\log x)$. The method is from Alexeev, Barreto, Li, Lichtman, Price, Shah, Tang and Tao; their paper explains its origin in GPT-5.4 Pro output. The invariant-weight formula is credited there to independent work of Will Sawin and Kevin Barreto. This exposition claims no novelty.

Restatement from Math-6250-A1 r1, with the source manuscript’s qualifications.

Original problem on erdosproblems.com

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 1

Math-6250-A1 · No claim recorded · LLM-generated · gpt 6 astra ultra ·

GPT 6 Astra Ultra attempt on Math-6250

Erdős Problem 1196: primitive sets with large least element

1. Statement and outcome

A set $A$ of positive integers is primitive if no two distinct members divide one another. For $A\subset[x,\infty)$, is \[ \sum_{a\in A}\frac1{a\log a}\le1+o(1)\qquad(x\to\infty) \] uniformly in $A$? Yes. We reconstruct the known von Mangoldt chain argument, using its invariant weight to obtain the explicit bound \[ \sum_{a\in A}\frac1{a\log a}\le\frac1{1-2/\log x}\qquad(x>e^2). \tag{1} \] This proves $1+O(1/\log x)$. The method is from Alexeev, Barreto, Li, Lichtman, Price, Shah, Tang and Tao; their paper explains its origin in GPT-5.4 Pro output. The invariant-weight formula is credited there to independent work of Will Sawin and Kevin Barreto. This exposition claims no novelty.

2. An exactly invariant weight

Write $\Lambda(q)=\log p$ if $q=p^j$ for a prime $p$ and $j\ge1$, and zero otherwise. Unique factorization gives \[ \sum_{q\mid n}\Lambda(q)=\log n,\qquad \sum_{q\ge2}\frac{\Lambda(q)}{q^s}=-\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}\quad(s>1). \tag{2} \] The second identity follows by logarithmic differentiation of the absolutely convergent Euler product. Define \[ \nu(1)=1,\qquad \nu(n)=\log n\int_1^\infty\frac{ds}{\zeta(s)n^s}\quad(n\ge2). \] These weights are positive and finite. For $n\ge2$, Tonelli's theorem, $2$, and integration by parts show \[ \begin{split} \sum_{q\ge2}\nu(nq)\frac{\Lambda(q)}{\log(nq)} &=\int_1^\infty\frac{-\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)^2n^s}\,ds\\ &=\log n\int_1^\infty\frac{ds}{\zeta(s)n^s}=\nu(n). \end{split}\tag{3} \] Both boundary terms $n^{-s}/\zeta(s)$ vanish. At $s\downarrow1$, this follows already from $\zeta(s)\ge\int_1^\infty t^{-s}dt=1/(s-1)$; at infinity it follows from $n\ge2$. For $n=1$, the same integral without $n^{-s}$ equals $[1/\zeta(s)]_1^\infty=1=\nu(1)$. Thus $3$ holds for all positive integers $n$.

3. A random divisibility chain and the antichain inequality

Start at $1$. From a current integer $n$, move to $nq$, $q\ge2$, with probability \[ P(n,nq)=\frac{\nu(nq)}{\nu(n)}\frac{\Lambda(q)}{\log(nq)}. \] Equation $3$ says that these probabilities sum to one. The resulting infinite sequence strictly increases and each member divides every later one.

The probability $h(m)$ that it ever visits $m$ equals $\nu(m)$. Prove this by induction on $m$. The assertion is true at $1$. For $m>1$, any visit has a unique preceding proper divisor $d$ of $m$; a preceding visit to $d$ has probability $h(d)$. Hence, using the induction hypothesis and $2$, \[ h(m)=\sum_{\substack{d\mid m\\d<m}}h(d)P(d,m) =\frac{\nu(m)}{\log m}\sum_{\substack{q\mid m\\q>1}}\Lambda(q)=\nu(m). \] A primitive set meets each such chain at most once. Taking expectations, with monotone convergence for infinite $A$, gives the exact inequality \[ \sum_{a\in A}\nu(a)\le1. \tag{4} \] No assertion of independence among different hitting events is needed.

4. Comparison with the requested weight

The elementary integral bound $\zeta(1+t)\le1+1/t$ for $t>0$ implies \[ \frac1{\zeta(1+t)}\ge\frac{t}{1+t}\ge t-t^2. \] For $L=\log n$, substitute $s=1+t$ and integrate to obtain \[ \begin{split} \nu(n)&=\frac{L}{n}\int_0^\infty\frac{e^{-Lt}}{\zeta(1+t)}\,dt\\ &\ge\frac{L}{n}\left(\frac1{L^2}-\frac2{L^3}\right) =\frac1{n\log n}\left(1-\frac2{\log n}\right). \end{split}\tag{5} \] The integrand lower bound remains valid when $t>1$, even though its right side is then negative. If $n\ge x>e^2$, $5$ is at least $(1-2/\log x)/(n\log n)$. Combining with $4$ proves $1$, uniformly over all primitive $A$ in the tail. The requested result is therefore proved, without needing the prime number theorem or an unproved estimate on primitive sets. Basic integration, the Euler product for real $s>1$, and the standard construction of a countable-state Markov chain are the background tools.

Sources: https://www.erdosproblems.com/1196; B. Alexeev et al., Primitive sets and von Mangoldt chains: Erdős Problem #1196 and beyond, especially the invariant weight in Remark 2.8, https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00301. No Lean verification was run for this text.

Completion rate estimate: 100%.

Go to contribution →