Math-1547 · mathematics · Combinatorics

Math-1547

Endpoint-deck gluing for one-edge deletion at a 3-uniform Ramsey threshold

Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

For $n\ge4$, let $R=r_3(n,n)$ be the least integer $N$ such that every red--blue coloring of the triples of an $N$-element set has an $n$-element subset whose triples all have the same color. Fix a triple $e\in\binom{[R]}3$, and form the hypergraph $H=K_R^{(3)}-e$, whose edge set is $\binom{[R]}3\setminus\{e\}$. The missing triple receives no color. A monochromatic $K_n^{(3)}$ in $H$ means an $n$-element subset $S\subseteq[R]$ such that all its triples belong to $E(H)$ and have the same color. In particular, $e$ cannot be a subset of $S$.

The question of Dudek and Rödl is whether every red--blue coloring of $E(H)$ necessarily contains such a monochromatic complete hypergraph, for every $n\ge4$. The choice of the deleted edge is irrelevant up to relabeling, but the coloring is otherwise unrestricted. The ordinary Ramsey property of $K_R^{(3)}$ does not immediately answer this: extending a coloring to the missing edge may produce only complete monochromatic sets that use it. The nontrivial range is stated explicitly. If $n=3$, then $r_3(3,3)=3$, deleting the sole edge leaves no $K_3^{(3)}$, and the unqualified assertion fails. This boundary case is excluded rather than silently asserted as part of the conjecture.

Short English statement

At the diagonal triple-system Ramsey threshold, does deleting a single triple preserve the Ramsey property?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.