Math-1874 · mathematics · Combinatorics

Math-1874

Disjoint spanning in- and out-arborescences

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

A finite loopless digraph $D=(V,A)$ is $k$-arc-connected if every nonempty proper subset $X\subset V$ has at least $k$ entering arcs. Applying the same condition to $V\setminus X$ also gives at least $k$ leaving arcs. Equivalently, every ordered pair of distinct vertices can be joined by $k$ pairwise arc-disjoint directed paths.

For a chosen root $r$, a spanning out-arborescence is a directed spanning tree with a directed path from $r$ to every vertex. A spanning in-arborescence has a directed path from every vertex to $r$. Is there an absolute positive integer $k_0$ such that every $k_0$-arc-connected digraph, for every choice of $r\in V$, contains an in-arborescence $T^-$ and an out-arborescence $T^+$ with \[ A(T^-)\cap A(T^+)=\varnothing? \] Both trees must span the same full vertex set and use the same prescribed root. They may share all their vertices; disjointness concerns arcs. The required constant cannot depend on the size or structure of the digraph, or on the selected root. Separate existence of an incoming tree and an outgoing tree follows under much weaker connectivity, but does not establish that both can be chosen simultaneously without sharing an arc. Parallel arcs, if present, are separate available arcs.

Short English statement

Does sufficiently high arc connectivity always guarantee disjoint incoming and outgoing spanning trees at every prescribed root?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.