Math-1870 · mathematics · Combinatorics

Math-1870

Deciding kernel-perfectness

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let $D=(V,A)$ be a finite loopless digraph; opposite arcs are allowed. A kernel is a subset $K\subseteq V$ that is stable and absorbing: no arc has both endpoints in $K$, and every $v\in V\setminus K$ has an arc $v\to u$ with $u\in K$. For $U\subseteq V$, let $D[U]$ be the induced subdigraph retaining exactly the arcs with both endpoints in $U$.

The digraph is kernel-perfect when \[ \text{every }D[U],\ U\subseteq V, \text{ has a kernel}. \] Determine the computational complexity of recognizing kernel-perfect digraphs, both in general and for structurally specified classes. In particular, seek efficient recognition criteria for natural classes where the universal induced-subgraph condition can be tested without enumerating every subset, and hardness classifications where it cannot.

The input is the digraph itself, rather than a supplied kernel for each induced subgraph. Having a kernel in $D$ alone is strictly less demanding than kernel-perfectness. The empty induced subgraph has the empty kernel. With the absorption convention above, reversing all arcs also reverses the direction used in the kernel condition; using out-dominating stable sets without that reversal would describe a different property of the given orientation.

Short English statement

Determine the complexity of recognizing digraphs in which every induced subdigraph has an absorbing stable set.

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.