Consistency Patterns Among Cardinal Characteristics
Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
Write $\omega$ for the natural numbers and $\omega_1$ for the first uncountable ordinal. For $f,g\in\omega^\omega$, put $f\leq^*g$ if $\{n\in\omega:f(n)>g(n)\}$ is finite. The bounding and dominating numbers are \[ \mathfrak b=\min\{|B|:B\subseteq\omega^\omega\text{ and }(\forall g\in\omega^\omega)(\exists f\in B)\ f\not\leq^*g\}, \] \[ \mathfrak d=\min\{|D|:D\subseteq\omega^\omega\text{ and }(\forall f\in\omega^\omega)(\exists g\in D)\ f\leq^*g\}. \] Let $[\omega]^\omega$ denote the infinite subsets of $\omega$. A set $S\subseteq\omega$ splits $X\in[\omega]^\omega$ if both $X\cap S$ and $X\setminus S$ are infinite. Define \[ \mathfrak s=\min\{|\mathcal S|:\mathcal S\subseteq[\omega]^\omega\text{ and }(\forall X\in[\omega]^\omega)(\exists S\in\mathcal S)\ S\text{ splits }X\}. \] A family $\mathcal A\subseteq[\omega]^\omega$ is almost disjoint if distinct members have finite intersection. It is maximal almost disjoint if every $X\in[\omega]^\omega$ has infinite intersection with some member of $\mathcal A$. Define \[ \mathfrak a=\min\{|\mathcal A|:\mathcal A\text{ is an infinite maximal almost disjoint family on }\omega\}. \] The requirement that $\mathcal A$ be infinite excludes finite maximal almost disjoint families.For an infinite cardinal $\kappa$, a proper ultrafilter $U$ on $\kappa$ is uniform if every member of $U$ has cardinality $\kappa$. A base for $U$ is a family $\mathcal B\subseteq U$ such that \[ (\forall A\in U)(\exists B\in\mathcal B)\ B\subseteq A. \] Under the uniform-ultrafilter convention, define \[ \mathfrak u(\kappa)=\min\{|\mathcal B|:\mathcal B\text{ is a base for a uniform ultrafilter on }\kappa\}. \] Here $2^{\aleph_1}=|\mathcal P(\omega_1)|$.
Using these standard interpretations, the supplied record asks the following three consistency questions, with all characteristics computed inside the model in question:
- Can a model of $\mathrm{ZFC}$ satisfy $\mathfrak b<\mathfrak s<\mathfrak d$?
- Can a model of $\mathrm{ZFC}$ satisfy $\mathfrak b<\mathfrak a<\mathfrak s$?
- Can a model of $\mathrm{ZFC}$ satisfy $\mathfrak u(\omega_1)<2^{\aleph_1}$?
Short English statement
The record asks whether three strict inequality patterns among cardinal characteristics can occur in models of set theory. The first two concern bounding, splitting, dominating, and almost disjointness on $\omega$; the third concerns the size of an ultrafilter base on $\omega_1$, interpreted here using uniform ultrafilters. The exact higher-cardinal convention and consistency assumptions require source confirmation. The supplied status is partially solved; this draft does not independently establish that assessment.Sources
- Supplied local registry record for permanent UnsolvedMath ID $30003420$, source problem code
catalogue entry, in the project'sdata/unsolvedmath/problems.jsonand supplementarycatalog/problems.jsonregistry system. Title: Consistency Patterns Among Cardinal Characteristics. Collection: Oberwolfach Reports Open Problems. No individual proposer is supplied; the proposed year is recorded as 2017. - Supplied report citation: Set Theory (2018), Oberwolfach Reports, DOI
10.4171/owr/2017/11, pp. 527--589. https://doi.org/10.4171/owr/2017/11. The supplied title year differs from the year appearing in the DOI and proposed-year field; this discrepancy is retained pending verification. - Supplied literature source: Cardinal characteristics at aleph omega. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05291.
- Supplied literature source: OWR Set Theory report. https://ems.press/content/serial-article-files/46674.
- Literature assessment dated exactly
2026-08-21: supplied dated curation, not independently verified. The record labels the problempartially_solvedand reports related forcing separations, including small ultrafilter numbers at higher cardinals, while stating that the full list of three extracted consistency questions is not settled as one theorem. This assessment does not identify which individual questions are resolved or specify their consistency hypotheses. The background expressly calls for independent verification of time-sensitive status and cited claims. - The supplied statement status is
corrected_verified; its accompanying explanation says that mathematical content was preserved while notation, typography, and sentence structure were repaired for publication. This is a supplied editorial qualification, not independent mathematical verification of this draft.
Statement licence: CC-BY-SA-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.