Math-1527 · mathematics · Graph theory

Math-1527

Conjecture 3.9 — Schneider

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let $\beta$ be an algebraic irrational complex number of degree $d=[\mathbb Q(\beta):\mathbb Q]\ge2$. Let $\alpha$ be a nonzero algebraic number, and fix a complex number $\lambda\ne0$ satisfying $e^\lambda=\alpha$. Define all powers using this same logarithm: \[ u_j=e^{\beta^j\lambda}=\alpha^{\beta^j},\qquad 1\le j\le d-1. \] In particular, $\alpha^{\beta^j}$ means exponentiation by $\beta^j$, not the $j$th power of $\alpha^\beta$.

Schneider's conjecture asks whether the $d-1$ numbers $u_1,\ldots,u_{d-1}$ are algebraically independent over $\mathbb Q$. That is, must $F(u_1,\ldots,u_{d-1})$ be nonzero for every nonzero polynomial $F\in\mathbb Q[X_1,\ldots,X_{d-1}]$, for every permitted $(\alpha,\beta,\lambda)$?

These hypotheses are supplied by the original source's setup preceding the conjecture. The degree is the minimal-polynomial degree of $\beta$, not a freely chosen upper bound. A single chosen logarithm is used throughout, and it need not be the principal logarithm. Even $\alpha=1$ is permitted when a nonzero logarithm is chosen.

The exponent list stops at $d-1$ because higher powers of $\beta$ satisfy rational linear relations involving its lower powers and one. The stated conclusion excludes every rational polynomial relation among the indicated exponential values. It requires more than pairwise distinctness, pairwise algebraic independence, or transcendence of each individual entry when $d-1>1$.

Short English statement

Are the powers of an algebraic number indexed by successive powers of an algebraic irrational exponent jointly algebraically independent?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.